Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Why Lawyers Can’t Give Straight Answers About Product Regulatory and Recall Risk (Part 3)

By Kelly Faglioni on January 26, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As we previously reported, Kelly Faglioni, a partner in our Product Liability group, authored an article identifying and discussing approaches for managing risk that arises from complexity and ambiguity in product regulatory schemes including approaches to the question: “To recall or not to recall?”

Parts 1 and 2 of the article illustrate that regulatory complexity makes it tough to know the right questions to ask, much less to get straight answers, and ambiguity prevents accurate predictions for purposes of setting accounting reserves. Nevertheless, a business that wishes to do business must project and plan in the face of complexity and uncertainty. That typically means budgeting for potential risk scenarios, planning for recall scenarios and in some cases, grappling with the ultimate question whether to recall or not to recall your product.

Remember that as an initial matter, your product group asked legal for input on the product regulatory and risk landscape. How will you give it to them?

Read Part 3 of the article.

  • Posted in:
    Business and Commercial
  • Blog:
    Hunton Retail Law Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo