Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

The Devil is in the Details: Recordkeeping a Central Focus in FSMA Inspections

By Chalana Williams on May 9, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
iStock_000003906886Large_books
© iStock

The Food Safety Modernization Act, which was signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011, promised sweeping reform of food safety practices from farm to fork, and shifted FDA’s regulatory posture from reacting to food contamination to proactively preventing it. While the Trump administration has vowed to eliminate two regulations for every new regulation, at this year’s Food and Drug Law Institute’s Annual meeting, Dr. Susan Mayne, the Director of FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, made clear that FSMA is the law of the land and FDA fully intends to continue its implementation and enforcement of it.

FSMA mandates that facilities that manufacture, process, pack or hold human food implement a written food safety plan focused on preventing hazards in foods. This plan involves:

  1. An evaluation of known or reasonably foreseeable hazards that could impact food safety including: biological hazards, chemical (including radiological) hazards, physical hazards, and hazards that may be intentionally introduced for purposes of economic gain;
  2. An assessment of the hazard, which includes an evaluation of the severity of illness or injury if the hazard were to occur and the probability that the hazard will occur in the absence of preventive controls;
  3. The identification of what preventive steps or controls will be put into place to significantly minimize or prevent each hazard;
  4. The specification of how the facility will monitor the preventive controls to ensure that they are effective;
  5. The maintenance of records of the monitoring;
  6. A written supply-chain program for those ingredients the receiving facility has identified as a hazard requiring a supply-chain applied control; and
  7. The recall plan.

Agency investigators are already out conducting modernized current good manufacturing practice inspections and full preventive control inspections. In evaluating new procedures, FDA expects that businesses have made a good faith effort to comply with FSMA. Consistent with FSMA’s intensive documentation requirements, Dr. Mayne emphasized that FDA inspections will target facility records. As such, manufacturers should have in place a thorough recordkeeping system demonstrating training, redundancy in the food safety plan, and a proactive effort to identify safety issues and prevent food contamination.

FSMA gives FDA broad authority to access records during routine inspections and without cause. These records should be accurate, detailed, and comprehensive.  Companies have spent countless hours and resources to ensure that preventive processes have been developed and implemented in accordance with FSMA’s requirements. However, when the FDA knocks on the door of your food facility, a successful inspection will depend on having ready thorough documentation to demonstrate that effort.

Photo of Chalana Williams Chalana Williams

Chalana Williams is an associate in the firm’s Antitrust and Advertising & Product Risk Management groups. Chalana provides litigation and counseling services with a focus on consumer protection matters, as well as the substantiation and defense of advertising claims. She counsels clients on…

Chalana Williams is an associate in the firm’s Antitrust and Advertising & Product Risk Management groups. Chalana provides litigation and counseling services with a focus on consumer protection matters, as well as the substantiation and defense of advertising claims. She counsels clients on compliance with statutes and regulations enforced by the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Federal Trade Commission. Chalana also has experience assisting both challengers and advertisers in disputes before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Her antitrust practice includes representing clients in inquiries by the Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission, as well as representing clients seeking to recover damages in private antitrust litigation.

Read more about Chalana WilliamsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo