Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

Shareholders Demand More Disclosure of Climate-Change Risks

By Jane E. Montgomery & David M. Loring on June 7, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
GettyImages-537061697

One day before the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, ExxonMobil shareholders overwhelmingly voted to require increased attention to and disclosure of the future impact of climate change on business expectations, while Chevron’s shareholders defeated similar proposals.

The shareholder proposals called for more transparent reporting and disclosure of the underlying assumptions used to evaluate the long-term reliance on future sales of oil and gas, including the assumptions underlying the valuation of oil and gas reserves. According to shareholders, these assumptions are key to understanding each company’s view of its book value. Various investors have concluded that information about possible market disruptors – like electric vehicle use or other new technologies – are not adequately considered in companies’ current projections, so they are asking for more details.

Increasing the quality of information disclosed to investors increases the efficiency of the markets, according to the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures, which is charged by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) with reviewing and developing standards for climate-related disclosures. Inadequate information can lead to mispricing of assets and misallocation of capital, both of which can lead to economic instability. The FSB is an international organization that includes governments, financial institutions, and others whose mission is to promote global financial stability by coordinating standards and consistent practices across the global economy. The task force is expected to release recommendations for climate disclosure this summer.

Regardless of the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, companies will still need to evaluate and disclose the risks and benefits to a company’s business posed by climate change. As noted in a prior post, U.S. securities laws require disclosure of information that would materially influence an investment decision, and these laws are not going away. The assumptions used in climate-change modeling, market disruptor adoption, international and national regulations, and consumer behavior are complex, and, according to the shareholder requests, could have an impact on an investor’s decision.

Two recent Carbon Disclosure Project reports offer further insight into actions and information that investors find most useful, which can be considered by companies as they evaluate greenhouse gas emissions and exposure to climate change-related risks.

As market forces continue to press for more information about possible climate change impacts on business value, companies can consider the following metrics when evaluating whether a disclosure is warranted:

  • Whether executive pay is linked to greenhouse gas reductions or other sustainability targets
  • Whether business strategies are analyzed against possible global temperature increases
  • Whether a “carbon price” is integrated into business projections
  • Whether the business is engaged in public policy discussions

If you have questions about climate change disclosure, please contact any member of the Schiff Hardin Environmental Group.

Photo of Jane E. Montgomery Jane E. Montgomery

Jane brings an in-depth understanding of the dynamic legal landscape governing the use of air, water, and land. She has extensive experience representing energy companies, developers, lenders, and manufacturing companies in a broad range of environmental matters, and regularly counsels clients on day-to-day…

Jane brings an in-depth understanding of the dynamic legal landscape governing the use of air, water, and land. She has extensive experience representing energy companies, developers, lenders, and manufacturing companies in a broad range of environmental matters, and regularly counsels clients on day-to-day compliance issues.

Read more about Jane E. MontgomeryEmailJane's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of David M. Loring David M. Loring

David M. Loring concentrates his practice in all areas of environmental law. He has counseled and represented electric generating and large industrial clients on a variety of federal, state and administrative litigation and regulatory matters.

Read more about David M. LoringEmail
  • Posted in:
    Energy, Environmental
  • Blog:
    Energy & Environmental Law Adviser
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo