Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Spinning Out of Control? Fidget Spinner Regulation and Safety

By Sarah K. Angelino & Jonathan Judge on June 12, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
SPINNER TOY

Children of all ages—and many adults—can’t keep their hands off fidget spinners, the best-selling toys of the spring and one of hottest new fad toys on the market. Schools in some states have banned them, while others find them helpful for children with attention-related difficulties. Predictably, fidget spinner manufacturers and distributors are feeling the heat of the spotlight, as reports emerge that children are hurting themselves with these toys. Regulators, distributors, and consumers now must sort out how the toys should be marketed and used.

What Is a Fidget Spinner?

Each spinner has a bearing in the center, covered by a circular pad, which the user holds while the toy spins. Most spinners have two or three prongs, though some have as many as six. The toys and bearings at their centers are made from various metals and plastics in solid colors or with patterns. Some spinners have a small battery to power a light-up function.

The toys come in a variety of shapes, colors, and designs. This variety is possible for two main reasons:

  1. Unlike fad toys of the past, the fidget spinner was not branded or promoted by one single, major retailer or manufacturer. Manufacturers are not competing with an “original” protected design: that is, nobody has a meaningful trademark, copyright, or patent on “fidget spinner.”
  2. The direct-to-consumer model fueled the toy’s popularity. Mostly sold online, these spinners are already in high demand without much advertising spend.

Why Are Some Calling the Toys Dangerous?

Fidget spinners have small parts and sometimes small batteries. Certain models, including those with only two prongs, are small enough to be swallowed whole. Consumers have reported that small parts can fall out of certain models; whether this occurs during proper use is not clear. Regardless of whether use was improper, when small parts fall off of a toy, children can get hurt.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has indicated that it is investigating two incidents involving fidget spinners. The first incident involved a ten-year-old who put a small part in her mouth and accidentally swallowed it. In the second, a five-year-old choked on a piece of his fidget spinner, despite his mother’s warning not to put it in his mouth. Both children needed surgery to remove the parts.

Are Fidget Spinners Regulated?

Under federal law, all toys sold in the U.S. must comply with federal product safety standards, including the American Society for Testing Materials’ regulation F963, also known as the “Toy Standard.” The Toy Standard incorporates relevant safety measures already required under federal law, and includes additional guidelines and test methods to prevent injuries from choking, sharp edges, and other potential hazards. Products intended for children three to six years old must be labeled if they contain small parts. Any products intended for children under 12 must be third-party tested to ensure compliance with federal regulations.

But when products are not made in the U.S. or sold through U.S. distributors, ensuring compliance with federal law becomes a challenge. Consumers who purchase directly from manufacturers abroad could receive products made without any consideration of the Toy Standard.

Even for those manufacturers who want to comply, regulating fidget spinners is not one-size-fits-all. Toys with batteries differ from those without; toys of different materials, sizes, and shapes will test differently, and may require different warning labels. The spinners available online and at other toy stores have wildly different warnings. Some stores have indicated that all fidget spinners are intended for ages 12+, while some stores offer products that list no recommended age at all.

Spinning in the Right Direction?

Fidget spinner manufacturers should take steps to confirm that products comply with the Toy Standard. A Children’s Product Certificate should accompany fidget spinner shipments to confirm that the toys meet the Toy Standard, using CPSC-certified, third-party laboratories. It is also important to monitor incident reports and determine whether there is a pattern of incidents which must be reported to the CPSC.

Distributors should also require Children’s Product Certificates to confirm that the fidget spinners they sell meet the Toy Standard. Brick-and-mortar toy stores and online vendors may wish to provide their own age and use warnings to customers purchasing fidget spinners. Finally, parents and consumers should follow the Toy Association’s guidance on fidget spinners to decide whether the product is a good choice for their own child.

Photo of Sarah K. Angelino Sarah K. Angelino

Sarah K. Angelino is a member of the Litigation and Dispute Resolution Group. She focuses her practice on commercial litigation and product liability matters. Sarah has experience in all phases of litigation, including discovery, motion practice, depositions, and trial. She has experience in

…

Sarah K. Angelino is a member of the Litigation and Dispute Resolution Group. She focuses her practice on commercial litigation and product liability matters. Sarah has experience in all phases of litigation, including discovery, motion practice, depositions, and trial. She has experience in both traditional litigation and arbitration settings, including as a first chair in securities arbitration. She is extremely attentive and applies a creative problem-solving approach to all of her work.

Read more about Sarah K. AngelinoEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jonathan Judge Jonathan Judge

Jonathan Judge is a trial lawyer who believes that analytics are an important part of cutting-edge legal advice. Jonathan is frequently asked to handle challenging cases involving consumer products, particularly those involving children and/or serious or fatal injuries to others.

Read more about Jonathan JudgeEmail
  • Posted in:
    Class Action & Mass Torts, Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    Product Liability & Mass Torts Blog
  • Organization:
    ArentFox Schiff LLP

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo