Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

FDA Seizes Stem Cell Therapy—A First of Many?

By Jim Johnson, Mike Druckman, Robert Church & David Horowitz on August 29, 2017
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On August 25, 2017, U.S. Marshals Service, at the request of FDA, seized five vials of ACAM20000—a smallpox vaccine containing live vaccinia virus (cow pox), which is reserved for people at high risk of contracting the disease—that were discovered during an FDA inspection at StemImmune Inc., a San Diego, California company that purports to specialize in “immune-oncology.”  Each of the vials originally contained 100 doses of the vaccine, and although one vial was partially used, four of the vials were intact.

According to the government’s Complaint for Forfeiture, the vaccine was combined with stem cells to create an unapproved treatment for late-stage cancers.  The government alleges that the stem cell/ACAM2000 combination contained ACAM2000 at several times the approved dose and was administered intravenously to potentially immune-compromised cancer patients, despite express warnings in ACAM2000’s FDA-approved labeling that the vaccine not be administered intravenously and not be used in individuals with severe immune deficiency.  In addition to potential harm to individuals who received the unapproved treatment, the complaint states that the use of live vaccine created a risk that the vaccinia virus could be transmitted to people in close contact with those individuals.

In an announcement of the seizure action, FDA Commissioner, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, took a strong stance against establishments such as StemImmune as “unscrupulous clinics” making “audacious but ultimately hollow claims” in order to take advantage of vulnerable patients.  Dr. Gottlieb stated that FDA would pursue both regulatory and criminal enforcement against such companies.

Not long ago FDA took a similarly strong enforcement posture against illegal drug-compounding operations—which has resulted in numerous enforcement actions and continues to be a focus of FDA inspectional resources and compliance activities to this day.  So the question is—are more enforcement actions coming in the near future against therapeutic stem cell operations that are not in compliance with FDA requirements?

Photo of David Horowitz David Horowitz

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at…

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at HHS (2010-2017), David oversaw and coordinated legal services in support of FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and international and emergency preparedness programs. His work focused on FDA regulatory policy and litigation. During his tenure at FDA – which included five years as head of the Office of Compliance for drugs, and three years as Assistant Commissioner for Compliance Policy – David played a leadership role in major initiatives, including the modernization of FDA’s approach to pharmaceutical manufacturing quality and the agency’s efforts to develop and implement a more scientific, risk-based approach to inspection and enforcement.

Over the course of his career at HHS and FDA, David developed substantial knowledge pertaining to FDA law and policy, with particular emphasis on pharmaceuticals, compliance, and the application of administrative law. He also developed a deep understanding of the institutions, organizational structures, procedures, and cultures through which regulatory policy and compliance decisions are considered, developed, and implemented across all branches of government, including Congress and the courts, as well as various components of FDA, HHS, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Justice, and the White House.

Read more about David HorowitzEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo