The IRS announced yesterday, in IR 2017-210 (the “Advisory”), that state property taxes must be “assessed” in 2017 in order for such taxes to be prepaid in calendar year 2017 and therefore deductible in 2017. The Advisory says that state or local law determines whether and when a property tax is “assessed,” but the Advisory adds additional color, describing the term as “generally when the taxpayer becomes liable for the property tax imposed.” Changes to the tax law for the 2018 taxable year will cap at $10,000 an individual taxpayer’s deduction for state and local income and property taxes, and so the Advisory is intended to guide those taxpayers who may be considering prepaying 2018 property taxes before December 31, 2017 to take the deduction in the 2017 taxable year.

The Advisory provides two examples. In the first, a county assesses property tax on July 1, 2017 for the period July 1, 2017-June 30, 2018 and announces that the property tax may be paid in two installments, on September 30, 2017 and January 31, 2018. The example concludes that if a taxpayer prepays the second installment on December 31, 2017, that payment would be deductible in 2017 because the tax was assessed in 2017.

In the second example, a county assesses and bills its residents for property taxes on July 1, 2017 for the period July 1, 2017-June 30, 2018. The county intends to make the usual assessment in July 2018 for the period July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019 but permits residents to prepay their 2018-2019 property taxes in 2017 and has revised its computer systems to accept prepayment property taxes for the 2018-2019 tax year. The example concludes that taxpayers who prepay their 2018-2019 property taxes in 2017 may not deduct the prepayment in 2017 because the county will not assess the property tax for the 2018-2019 tax year until July 1, 2018. This second example generally describes the California system. Taxes for the period ending June 30, 2018 have been “assessed” and will be deductible if paid on or before December 31, 2017. The Advisory suggests that that California residents (and residents of other states and localities with similar systems) may not deduct taxes for the period beginning July 1, 2018.

It is unclear whether the executive order issued by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo (Executive Order 172, December 22, 2017) results in the assessment of property taxes in 2017, or merely authorizes their collection. It is possible that either the New York State government or the local property tax assessors will issue additional guidance in time to help taxpayers determine whether any 2018 property taxes have been “assessed” within the meaning of the Advisory. Taxpayers considering making prepayments in any jurisdiction (whether or not in New York) may wish to contact their tax assessors office to determine what property taxes have been “assessed” within the meaning of the Advisory.

Taxpayers should be aware that any benefit of prepayment may be lost if the prepayment would result in the taxpayer being subject to the alternative minimum tax. Additionally, prepayments in 2017 of state and local income taxes for 2018 are not deductible in 2017. Taxpayers who are considering prepaying any state and local taxes before the end of 2017 should consult with their individual tax advisers as to the consequences of such prepayments.

 

Photo of David S. Miller David S. Miller

David Miller is a partner in the Tax Department. David advises clients on a broad range of domestic and international corporate tax issues. His practice covers the taxation of financial instruments and derivatives, cross-border lending transactions and other financings, international and domestic mergers…

David Miller is a partner in the Tax Department. David advises clients on a broad range of domestic and international corporate tax issues. His practice covers the taxation of financial instruments and derivatives, cross-border lending transactions and other financings, international and domestic mergers and acquisitions, multinational corporate groups and partnerships, private equity and hedge funds, bankruptcy and workouts, high-net-worth individuals and families, and public charities and private foundations. He advises companies in virtually all major industries, including banking, finance, private equity, health care, life sciences, real estate, technology, consumer products, entertainment and energy.

David is strongly committed to pro bono service, and has represented more than 200 charities. In 2011, he was named as one of eight “Lawyers Who Lead by Example” by the New York Law Journal for his pro bono service. David has also been recognized for his pro bono work by The Legal Aid Society, Legal Services for New York City and New York Lawyers For The Public Interest.

Photo of Martin T. Hamilton Martin T. Hamilton

Martin T. Hamilton is a partner in the Tax Department. He primarily handles U.S. corporate, partnership and international tax matters.

Martin’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, cross-border investments and structured financing arrangements, as well as tax-efficient corporate financing techniques and the tax…

Martin T. Hamilton is a partner in the Tax Department. He primarily handles U.S. corporate, partnership and international tax matters.

Martin’s practice focuses on mergers and acquisitions, cross-border investments and structured financing arrangements, as well as tax-efficient corporate financing techniques and the tax treatment of complex financial products. He has experience with public and private cross-border mergers, acquisitions, offerings and financings, and has advised both U.S. and international clients, including private equity funds, commercial and investment banks, insurance companies and multinational industrials, on the U.S. tax impact of these global transactions.

In addition, Martin has worked on transactions in the financial services, technology, insurance, real estate, health care, energy, natural resources and industrial sectors, and these transactions have involved inbound and outbound investment throughout Europe and North America, as well as major markets in East and South Asia, South America and Australia.

Photo of Stuart Rosow Stuart Rosow

Stuart Rosow is a partner in the Tax Department and a leader of the transactional tax team. He concentrates on the taxation of complex business and investment transactions. His practice includes representation of publicly traded and privately held corporations, financial institutions, operating international…

Stuart Rosow is a partner in the Tax Department and a leader of the transactional tax team. He concentrates on the taxation of complex business and investment transactions. His practice includes representation of publicly traded and privately held corporations, financial institutions, operating international and domestic joint ventures, and investment partnerships, health care providers, charities and other tax-exempt entities and individuals.

For corporations, Stuart has been involved in both taxable and tax-free mergers and acquisitions. His contributions to the projects include not only structuring the overall transaction to ensure the parties’ desired tax results, but also planning for the operation of the business before and after the transaction to maximize the tax savings available. For financial institutions, Stuart has participated in structuring and negotiating loans and equity investments in a wide variety of domestic and international businesses. Often organized as joint ventures, these transactions offer tax opportunities and present pitfalls involving issues related to the nature of the financing, the use of derivations and cross-border complications. In addition, he has advised clients on real estate financing vehicles, including REITs and REMICs, and other structured finance products, including conduits and securitizations.

Stuart’s work on joint ventures and partnerships has involved the structuring and negotiating of a wide range of transactions, including deals in the health care field involving both taxable and tax-exempt entities and business combinations between U.S. and foreign companies. He has also advised financial institutions and buyout funds on a variety of investments in partnerships, including operating businesses, as well as office buildings and other real estate. In addition, Stuart has represented large partnerships, including publicly traded entities, on a variety of income tax matters, including insuring retention of tax status as a partnership; structuring public offerings; and the tax aspects of mergers and acquisitions among partnership entities.

Also actively involved in the health care field, Stuart has structured mergers, acquisitions and joint ventures for business corporations, including publicly traded hospital corporations, as well as tax-exempt entities. This work has led to further involvement with tax-exempt entities, both publicly supported entities and private foundations. A significant portion of the representation of these entities has involved representation before the Internal Revenue Service on tax audits and requests for private letter rulings and technical advice.

Stuart also provides regular advice to corporations, a number of families and individuals. This advice consists of helping to structure private tax-advantaged investments; tax planning; and representation before the Internal Revenue Service and local tax authorities on tax examinations.

A frequent lecturer at CLE programs, Stuart is also an adjunct faculty member of the Columbia Law School where he currently teaches Partnership Taxation.