Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Hands Off-Pants On Ordinance In Effect in Chicago; California May Be Next

By Shawn D. Fabian & Michael Roth on August 10, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last October, we wrote about a Chicago ordinance requiring hotel employers to, among other things, equip hotel employees assigned to work in guestrooms or restrooms with portable emergency contact devices. The ordinance took effect July 1, 2018. Hotel employers in Chicago should ensure compliance with the mandates of the ordinance as penalties may reach $500 for each offense. Each day a violation continues is deemed a new offense.

Shortly after the Chicago City Council approved the ordinance, AB 1761 was introduced in the California Assembly on January 4, 2018. The bill passed the Assembly and now awaits further consideration in the Senate. Similar to the Chicago ordinance, the California bill would require hotel employers to provide its employees with a panic button in order to summon immediate assistance when working alone in a guestroom.

The California legislation would also require hotel employers to post a notice on the back of each guestroom door with the heading, “The Law Protects Hotel Housekeepers and Other Employees from Sexual Assault and Harassment.” Additionally, if an employee informs the hotel employer that the employee has been subjected to an act of violence, sexual assault or sexual harassment by a guest, then the hotel employer is required to: (1) provide the employee with paid time off to contact law enforcement, seek legal relief, contact an attorney, or seek medical treatment, counseling or other services; (2) provide reasonable accommodations to the employee, including but not limited to, transfer, reassignment, modified schedule, or any other reasonable adjustment to a job structure, workplace facility or work requirement; (3) report the act committed against the employee to law enforcement upon request of the employee; and (4) investigate reports of workplace harassment and take appropriate corrective actions.

For purposes of the California bill, “employee” is defined as an individual who, in any particular workweek, performs at least two hours of work for a hotel employer. “Hotel employer” is defined as hotel, motel, bed and breakfast inn, or similar transient lodging establishment.

We will continue to monitor the California legislation as it works its way through the Senate.

Photo of Shawn D. Fabian Shawn D. Fabian

Shawn Fabian is a partner in the Labor and Employment Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago and New York offices.

Read more about Shawn D. FabianEmail
Photo of Michael Roth Michael Roth

Michael Roth is a partner in the Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental Practice Group in the firm’s Chicago office.

Read more about Michael RothEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Employment Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo