Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

High Court rejects legal bid to prevent fracking in Lancashire, UK

By Lucy Bruce Jones (UK) & Victoria McKeegan (UK) on October 15, 2018
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The High Court has refused to grant an interim injunction preventing Cuadrilla from carrying out hydraulic fracking operations at the Preston New Road site in Lancashire. The ruling means that Cuadrilla can resume fracking in the UK for the first time since 2011.

Mr Justice Supperstone also refused permission for judicial review of Lancashire County Council’s decision over the adequacy of the risk assessment and emergency planning procedures.

Cuadrilla had been granted a petroleum exploration and development licence and an environmental permit for the Preston New Road site, as well as planning permission in 2016 to develop the site as a temporary exploration site with permission to drill, hydraulically fracture and test the flow of natural gas from up to four horizontal wells. Having completed drilling for the UK’s first two horizontal shale gas wells, and obtained Hydraulic Fracturing Consent from the Secretary of State in July 2018, the company was due to commence hydraulic fracking.

The High Court initially granted an interim injunction on 5 October preventing the commencement of fracking until the hearing on 12 October. The claimant local resident sought to extend the interim injunction until such time as the High Court had an opportunity to consider the claimant’s proposed legal challenge.

In requesting permission for a judicial review, the claimant submitted that the local planning authority had failed to carry out an adequate risk assessment (categorising the risk of fracking as ‘medium’ rather than ‘high’); had failed to apply the ‘precautionary principle’; and had failed in its duty to communicate with the local community about the risks associated with fracking and emergency procedures.

However, the court refused both applications and held that there was not a ‘serious issue’ to be tried which would justify an interim order. In addition, the court held that the environmental and regulatory risk had been adequately assessed and that there was no evidence to support the claim that the risk should have been categorised as ‘high’ rather than ‘medium’. In this respect, the court was reluctant to intervene and substitute its own risk assessment for that of experts. The risk assessment had satisfactorily applied the ‘precautionary principle’ by considering the worst-case scenario and there was no arguable case that the local planning authority had failed to conduct appropriate emergency planning procedures.

Following the ruling, Cuadrilla announced its intention to start fracking immediately and news reports indicate that, notwithstanding a blockade by protestors at the entrance of the site, fracking commenced on 15 October. It has been reported that the claimant will appeal against the judge’s decision.

R. (on the application of Dennett) v Lancashire CC

Photo of Lucy Bruce Jones (UK) Lucy Bruce Jones (UK)
Read more about Lucy Bruce Jones (UK)Email
Photo of Victoria McKeegan (UK) Victoria McKeegan (UK)
Read more about Victoria McKeegan (UK)Email
  • Posted in:
    Environmental and Climate
  • Blog:
    The Hydraulic Fracking Blog
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo