Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Are You a Money Transmitter in Michigan? In California?

By Sean Ruff & Adam Fleisher on January 4, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The payments and money transmission regulatory landscape continues to evolve.  A key new development is that Michigan has affirmed by legislation that “agent of a payee” transactions meeting certain criteria are not subject to regulation under the state’s money transmission licensing law. However, the California Department of Business Oversight (the “DBO”), which regulates money transmission in California, continues to scrutinize the scope of what constitutes payee-agency activity exempt from money transmission licensing.  In light of these developments, businesses that rely on payee-agency exemptions should closely evaluate the structure of their arrangements to assess whether they come within specific state exemptions and whether any affirmative steps need to be taken to confirm compliance with specific regulators.

Read our client alert.

  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    MoFo ReEnforcement: The Enforcement Blog
  • Organization:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo