Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

OIG proposes to eliminate safe harbor protection for drug manufacturer rebates to PBMs; proposes two new safe harbors

By Russell Kott on February 5, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 31, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) issued a proposed new rule that, if finalized, would eliminate existing protection under the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) “discount” safe harbor (42 C.F.R. 1001.952(h)) for drug manufacturers’ rebates to plan sponsors or pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) acting under contract with plan sponsors under the Medicare Part D and Medicaid managed care (“Medicaid MCOs”) programs. If the rule is finalized, these type of rebates could be subject to prosecution under the AKS. In addition to eliminating such drug rebates, HHS proposes to create two new safe harbors that would: (1) protect point-of-sale discounts that drug manufacturers offer directly to patients; and (2) protect certain fixed fee service arrangements between drug manufacturers and PBMs.

In the preamble to the proposed rule, HHS outlines the key reasons why it believes the current protection for manufacturer rebates to plan sponsors (or PBMs under contract with the plan sponsors) under Medicare Part D and Medicaid MCOs should be eliminated. HHS’ fact sheet,which accompanied the proposed rule, outlines three reasons why the current safe harbor for these types of rebates should be eliminated:

  1. Rebates drive up the price of drugs because PBMs and Medicare Part D plans typically negotiate rebates as a percentage of the list price. Federal healthcare beneficiaries often pay a percentage of the list price and thus pay more for drugs when the list price increases.
  2. Drug manufacturers pay rebates and other payments to PBMs, but these savings generally are not passed on to consumers and, therefore, result in higher out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs.
  3. The rebate system discourages the use of lower-priced generics and biosimilars because insurers and Medicare Part D plan sponsors can extract higher rebates for brand drugs and biologics.

The proposed rule would also add two new safe harbors.  The first would protect point-of-sale price reductions offered by manufacturers on certain drugs payable under Medicare Part D or by Medicaid MCOs. HHS says that these point-of-sale reductions create less risk for fraud and abuse to federal healthcare programs than the current rebate system.

The second proposed safe harbor would permit a fixed fee model between PBMs and drug manufacturers for “pharmacy benefit management services.” It would not permit fees for services provided by the PBM to a health plan. Although the rule does not define “pharmacy benefit management services,” it gives several examples of what would qualify, including “contracting with a network of pharmacies; establishing payment levels for network pharmacies; negotiating rebate arrangements; developing and managing formularies, preferred drug lists, and prior authorization programs; performing drug utilization review; and operating disease management programs.”

HHS says that “[r]eplacing safe harbor protections for opaque rebates with transparent discounts is expected to lead to lower Part D spending for Medicare beneficiaries as a whole, because the projected reductions in out-of-pocket costs are larger than potential increases in premiums.” Note that the proposed rule would only apply to rebates affecting federal healthcare programs and therefore would not directly impact commercial insurance rebates.

We anticipate that the proposed rule will have a significant impact on the current drug payment system, if finalized. Entities currently protected under the old safe harbor will need to restructure their contractual arrangements to comply with the new rule; similarly, entities that wish to claim protection under the new safe harbors will need to do the same.

If finalized, the new rule would take effect January 1, 2020. HHS is currently soliciting comments on whether “the proposed effective date gives affected entities a sufficient transition period for any necessary restructuring of arrangements.” The deadline for submitting comments on the proposed rule is 5:00 PM on April 7, 2019.

Norton Rose Fulbright is closely following the proposed rule and will post updates as information becomes available.

Photo of Russell Kott Russell Kott

Russell provides years of experience to the Technical Support Success Team to assure quality and efficient customer service. While growing within his role as a technical support specialist, he utilizes his time to focus energy in improving skills towards development and design to…

Russell provides years of experience to the Technical Support Success Team to assure quality and efficient customer service. While growing within his role as a technical support specialist, he utilizes his time to focus energy in improving skills towards development and design to improve his role within the company and his future career.

Email
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Health Law Pulse
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo