Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Possible expansion of “Testing the Waters” for Securities Offerings

By Stacie Aarestad on February 22, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
GettyImages-144337825-300x200.jpg

In apparent recognition of the popularity of “testing the waters” by Emerging Growth Companies (EGCs) before proceeding with an IPO, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently voted to propose an expansion of this accommodation to all companies.[1]  Currently, EGCs and any person authorized to act on behalf of an EGC may engage in oral or written communications with potential investors that are qualified institutional buyers or institutional accredited investors to determine whether these investors might have an interest in a contemplated securities offering without violating the SEC’s prohibition on gun-jumping.

This outreach by EGCs may occur both prior to and after the registration statement is filed for the offered securities.  The ability to test investor appetite, especially when coupled with an EGCs ability to confidentially submit draft registration statements, allows EGCs to determine the viability of a proposed offering without the potential for negative publicity if an offering is abandoned or otherwise cannot be completed.  In July 2017, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance expanded the confidential submission process in the IPO context to all companies in addition to EGCs but declined to expand the testing the waters accommodation at that time.[2]

The SEC indicated that its intent in proposing Securities Act Rule 163B, which would permit all companies to test the waters, is to encourage more companies to consider entry into the public equity markets.  The proposal will be subject to a 60-day comment period.


[1] The proposal also includes investment companies.

[2]Confidential submissions are permitted for registration statements related to IPOs, initial Exchange Act registrations (including spin-offs) and offerings made in the first year after an IPO or Exchange Act listing.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    IPO, Then What?
  • Organization:
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo