Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Strike Out or Homerun? Utah Amends Non-Compete Statute for the Third Time

By Laura J. Mitchell Baker & Raija Horstman on April 9, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On March 22, 2019, the State of Utah amended its non-compete statute for the third time in only three years.

“Strike One” came in 2016, when the State of Utah enacted Utah Code Annotated 34-51-201 et seq.to restrict the validity of post-employment restrict covenants to no more than one year from the date on which an employee is no longer employed by the employer. (But it only applied to covenants entered into on or after May 10, 2016).

Two years later in 2018, “Strike Two” placed conditions on when and where the amended statute applies, in response to lobbying by the broadcasting industry. For example, employers could not limit competition if the employee leaves the employer before contract expiration and an employer could only enforce a non-compete if the employment contract did not exceed four years. Additionally, an employer could only enforce a non-compete if the employer terminated the employee for cause or the employee breached the employment contract that results in his or her separation from the employer.

But, just a year later, the state of Utah took another swing and removed the four-year limit, and replaced it with new language permitting the application of a non-compete in any written contract of “reasonable duration, based on industry standards, the position, the broadcasting employee’s experience, geography, and the parties’ unique circumstances.”

With these changes, employers in Utah must keep in mind the shifting laws on the applicability and enforcement of non-competes. Time will tell if Utah hit it out of the park with these new requirements.

Photo of Laura J. Mitchell Baker Laura J. Mitchell Baker

Laura J. Mitchell Baker is a counsel with Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Laura represents government contractors in litigation and administrative matters, including contract disputes with state and federal entities, suspension and debarment proceedings, mandatory disclosures…

Laura J. Mitchell Baker is a counsel with Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.

Laura represents government contractors in litigation and administrative matters, including contract disputes with state and federal entities, suspension and debarment proceedings, mandatory disclosures to the government, prime-sub disputes, and False Claims Act investigations. Her practice also includes counseling on federal, state, and local government contracts, government contracts due diligence, and regulatory and compliance matters, as well as conducting internal investigations.

Read more about Laura J. Mitchell BakerEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Raija Horstman Raija Horstman
Read more about Raija HorstmanEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Trade Secrets Trends
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo