Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Rospatent gives the green light to foreign applicants from 11 states

By Boris Malakhov of Lidings Law Firm on April 11, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As outlined in art. 1247 of the Russian Civil Code, any applicant may choose one of the options how to be represented before Rospatent:

  • directly, or
  • by a Russian patent attorney, or
  • by another representative (e.g., attorney-at-law)
The list is significantly shortened for foreign applicants: under art. 1247 (2) of the Civil Code, foreign citizens and legal entities may be represented before Rospatent only by Russian patent attorneys, unless otherwise envisaged by an international treaty.

In a few recent decisions the Russian IP Court interpreted this rule broadly (e.g., Decision of the Presidium of the IPC on case IPC- 184/2014 dated 30.01.2015) as to legalize all three mentioned options for foreign applicants. By doing so, the IP Court relied on the principle of national regime as outlined in the Paris Convention and Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.
On 28.02.2019, in order to clarify the mechanism of cooperation Rospatent issued the Notice on cooperation between applicants and foreign Patent Offices.
It says, that international treaties between Russia and the member-states of the EAEU (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan) as well as Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenia, Uzbekistan and Ukraine have enabled all applicants domiciled or located in these states to act directly before Patent Offices without additional formalities.
The rule applies to Russian applicants dealing with foreign Patent Offices of Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenia, Uzbekistan and Ukraine as well as foreigners dealing with Rospatent.
Even so, Rospatent may require that foreign applicants have to provide correspondence address on the Russian territory when acting directly before Rospatent (art. 1247 (2) of the Civil Code).
This clarification will definitely bring practice of the Patent Offices of the mentioned states in harmony and strengthen cooperation between them. Just as important, this practice will help to minimize budgets for IP prosecution on the international level.
Photo of Boris Malakhov of Lidings Law Firm Boris Malakhov of Lidings Law Firm

Boris is a senior associate in our Moscow office’s dispute resolution practice. He focuses on various dispute resolution issues, including assessment of claims and potential litigation risks. His area of expertise includes Russian civil and arbitration law, customs and intellectual property issues with…

Boris is a senior associate in our Moscow office’s dispute resolution practice. He focuses on various dispute resolution issues, including assessment of claims and potential litigation risks. His area of expertise includes Russian civil and arbitration law, customs and intellectual property issues with special focus on copyright and patent rights, including protection measures against trademark infringements and court representation.

Read more about Boris Malakhov of Lidings Law FirmEmailBoris's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo