Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

New FDA draft guidance on voluntary recalls highlights importance of recall initiation plans

By Jim Johnson, Jodi Scott, David Horowitz, Mike Heyl & Elizabeth Fawell on April 25, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
plan

On April 23, FDA issued draft guidance entitled “Initiation of Voluntary Recalls Under 21 CFR Part 7, Subpart C,” which aims to clarify how firms in a product distribution chain should prepare to facilitate timely initiation of a voluntary recall, respond to an indication of a problem with a distributed product, and initiate a voluntary recall.  Overall, FDA emphasizes the importance of pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device, food, tobacco, and animal products firms having made plans in advance of a recall so that they are prepared, should one become necessary.

How to be “Recall Ready”

In order to facilitate timely initiation of a voluntary recall, the draft guidance recommends firms make the following preparations:

  • Designate specific employees with recall-related responsibilities who possess the authority to take the steps needed to implement a product recall when necessary.
  • Train personnel on recall-related responsibilities, and consider additional preparatory steps such as mock recalls and establishing metrics appropriate to a recall plan.
  • Create a recall communications plan that identifies specific points-of-contact, and that contains draft templates that help the firm issue recall communications promptly.
  • Identify possible recall-associated reporting requirements, for circumstances when a significant problem with a distributed product may trigger a requirement to make a separate report to FDA, g., a report to the Reportable Food Registry or reports under 21 CFR 806 for medical devices.
  • Ensure adequate product coding to make possible positive lot identification and to facilitate the effective recall of all violative lots.
  • Maintain product distribution records for a period of time that exceeds the shelf life and expected use of the product and is at least the length of time specified in other applicable regulations concerning records retention. The records should contain enough detail to identify the consignees that actually received the recalled product and must conform to any applicable requirements.

The draft guidance further advises a firm to maintain written recall initiation procedures that assign responsibility and describe the steps to perform all actions related to initiating a recall, as appropriate to the specific products and business model of the firm or facility.  These procedures should include actions such as (1) ceasing distribution, shipment or sales of affected product; (2) developing a recall strategy; (3) notifying direct consignees; and (4) when appropriate, notifying the public of the recall.

Steps for responding to an indication of a problem

The draft guidance outlines specific steps a firm should take if there is an indication of a problem with a distributed product:

  1. Identify the problem using indicators such as an internal report of a product specification deviation or out-of-specification testing results for a product.
  2. Promptly investigate the problem to ensure that potential risks are consistently assessed and investigated for products potentially affected.
  3. Make decisions about whether a recall is necessary, and if so, about the scope and depth of that recall.
  4. Consult with FDA about the problem, referencing the ORA recall coordinator list.

This draft guidance is part of a series of policy steps FDA is taking to strengthen and modernize the process for issuing a public warning about a voluntary recall and for notification of recalls, as we recently discussed in a February 26 alert.  FDA Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs Melinda K. Plaisier said in a press release that “there is more that needs to be done,” adding that FDA “will continue its efforts to improve recalls, and will encourage the use of new technologies and other tools that can assist in those efforts.”

The voluntary recall draft guidance is open for public comment until June 24; please contact any of the above-listed authors if you have any questions about the guidance or may be interested in commenting.  We will continue to keep you apprised of new FDA efforts to inform companies on proper procedures for voluntary recalls.

Photo of David Horowitz David Horowitz

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at…

Partner, Washington, D.C.

David Horowitz brings 25 years of combined experience at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the FDA to help clients anticipate and navigate regulatory challenges, and participating in the policy-making process.

As Deputy General Counsel at HHS (2010-2017), David oversaw and coordinated legal services in support of FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and international and emergency preparedness programs. His work focused on FDA regulatory policy and litigation. During his tenure at FDA – which included five years as head of the Office of Compliance for drugs, and three years as Assistant Commissioner for Compliance Policy – David played a leadership role in major initiatives, including the modernization of FDA’s approach to pharmaceutical manufacturing quality and the agency’s efforts to develop and implement a more scientific, risk-based approach to inspection and enforcement.

Over the course of his career at HHS and FDA, David developed substantial knowledge pertaining to FDA law and policy, with particular emphasis on pharmaceuticals, compliance, and the application of administrative law. He also developed a deep understanding of the institutions, organizational structures, procedures, and cultures through which regulatory policy and compliance decisions are considered, developed, and implemented across all branches of government, including Congress and the courts, as well as various components of FDA, HHS, Office of Management and Budget, Department of Justice, and the White House.

Read more about David HorowitzEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Food, Drug & Agriculture
  • Blog:
    Focus on Regulation
  • Organization:
    Hogan Lovells
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo