Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

What Is The Difference Between Lack of Capacity and Undue Influence

By Keith A. Davidson on May 3, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

https://youtu.be/vsEEZOHUhpk

The Following is a Transcript of this Video. For More Information, CLICK HERE

Hi, this is Keith Davidson from Albertson & Davidson.  In this video, I want to discuss the difference between lack of capacity and undue influence.  And we talk a lot about these concepts on our videos, on our blog, on all of our websites, because it really is the most important part of a trust or will contest.  We’re almost always bringing a claim to try to overturn a trust or will based on lack of capacity or undue influence.

But those two claims are really quite different.

With lack of capacity, you’re looking at the parent, the elder, the person who created the trust or will.  And you’re trying to figure out did they have the mental requirements, under the law, to be able to create a trust or a will.  And in order to dislodge a trust or will, we have to find medical evidence that shows a mental defect existed at the time the trust or will was signed.  All of the focus is on the parent.

Now, on undue influence, the focus isn’t just on the elder.  There is one element we have to look and see if the elder was vulnerable to undue influence, but then after that, we’re looking more at a bad actor.  Somebody, under undue influence claim, came in and influenced the elder, coerced the elder, replaced the intent of the elder with their own intent and so we have to look at the actions of the bad actor.  What actions did they take?  Were they in a position of authority?  Were they controlling medications or food or access to family members and friends?  All of these factors come into play with undue influence.

And so, a lot of times, we like to say that undue influence is capacity light.  Meaning that you don’t have to prove an actual lack of capacity to succeed with undue influence, you only have to show that there was enough of a mental capacity issue to make the elder vulnerable to undue influence.

Once you have that, then the rest of the elements are going to focus on the bad actor, not just on the elder.  So that’s kind of a basic overview of the difference between lack of capacity and undue influence.

Photo of Keith A. Davidson Keith A. Davidson
Read more about Keith A. DavidsonEmailKeith's Twitter Profile
  • Posted in:
    Probate & Estate Planning
  • Blog:
    California Trust, Estate & Probate Litigation
  • Organization:
    Albertson & Davidson, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo