Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

CIPL Submits Comments to the EDPB’s Draft Guidelines on Data Processing Through Video Devices

By vchiu on September 16, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On September 6, 2019, the Centre for Information Policy Leadership (“CIPL”) at Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP submitted formal comments to the European Data Protection Board (the “EDPB”) on its draft guidelines on processing of personal data through video devices (the “Guidelines”). The Guidelines were adopted on July 10, 2019, for public consultation.

In its response, CIPL provided comments both on the processing of personal data through video devices generally, as well as on aspects of the guidelines that relate specifically to facial recognition technology.

CIPL believes the guidelines are overly restrictive in some respects and do not account for certain legitimate uses of video devices and facial recognition. CIPL recommends several changes or clarifications the EDPB should incorporate in its final Guidelines throughout its comments.

With respect to facial recognition technology, CIPL’s comments note, in particular, that:

  • Article 9 of the GDPR should be applicable only when the technology is actually used for the specific purpose of uniquely identifying an individual;
  • The possible applicable legal bases should not be limited to consent of the individual depending on the circumstances;
  • There is a need to differentiate facial recognition from facial characterization and cases of unique persistent identifiers;
  • The guidelines should not include a blanket prohibition on making access to services conditional on biometric processing or a requirement that the controller must offer an alternative solution that does not involve biometric processing. The test that must be passed is whether the processing is proportionate or whether a legal obligation to conduct the processing exists.

To read about these recommendations in detail, along with all of CIPL’s other recommendations on the draft guidelines, please view the full response.

  • Posted in:
    Privacy & Data Security
  • Blog:
    Privacy & Information Security Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Labor and Employment Law Insights
  • Age of Disruption
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo