Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Was Missguided Misguided? Kim Kardashian West Obtains $2.7 Million Judgment in Right of Publicity and Trademark Suit

By Marc J. Rachman of Davis+Gilbert LLP & Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP on September 18, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A federal district court in California has awarded a $2.7-million default judgment to Kim Kardashian West in her lawsuit against a fast fashion online retailer that allegedly used her persona and likeness to sell its clothing, in part by repeatedly tagging her on Instagram and linking to the retailer’s e-commerce site.

Kardashian West’s suit is an example of celebrities taking action to combat the improper online use of their identities.

Kim Kardashian West’s Suit
Kardashian West and her loan out company Kimsaprincess, Inc. (together, Kardashian) filed a lawsuit in California against Missguided USA (Finance) Inc. and Missguided Limited (together, Missguided), accusing them of misappropriating her persona as part of its marketing and sales strategy to sell clothing online. According to Kardashian’s complaint, Missguided “systematically uses the names and images of Kardashian” to “advertise and spark interest in its website and clothing.”

In particular, Kardashian asserted, Missguided’s website and social media pages, including Instagram, were “riddled with images of and references to Kardashian” intended to promote its website and drive sales of clothing purportedly “inspired by” Kardashian. Kardashian contended that Missguided’s use of her name and likeness was “so pervasive” that consumers had begun to erroneously believe that she was affiliated with Missguided and was working with it to “knock off the clothing” that fashion designers had created for her.

Kardashian’s complaint asserted violations of her right of publicity, false designation of origin and trademark infringement. She sought monetary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and an injunction barring Missguided from using her name, images, likeness, persona and trademarks.

The Decision
The district court granted a default judgment to Kardashian, and awarded her $2.7 million in damages (which it calculated at $300,000 per each of nine unauthorized Instagram posts by Missguided) and $59,600 in attorneys’ fees (which it calculated according to a court rule establishing a schedule for attorneys’ fees in cases involving default judgments).

In addition, the court permanently enjoined Missguided from using Kardashian West’s trademarks in connection with the sale, marketing or distribution of its products.

Courses of Action
When pre-litigation efforts, such as sending cease-and-desist letters and submitting takedown notices to social media platforms that host false advertisements, are unsuccessful or not sufficient to stop the infringing conduct, instituting a lawsuit may also bring results, as illustrated by the Kardashian suit.

Bottom Line

A celebrity’s most valuable asset is likely their name and likeness. As the Kardashian case illustrates, many celebrities are being targeted by third parties who use their names and images without their permission when promoting products or services. There are a number of steps that celebrities can take to stop the unauthorized commercial use of their name and likeness, such as submitting website and social media takedown notices, sending cease and desist letters and, of course, filing lawsuits.

 

Connect with Marc and Brooke on LinkedIn.

Photo of Marc J. Rachman of Davis+Gilbert LLP Marc J. Rachman of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Marc Rachman, a partner in the Litigation + Dispute Resolution and Intellectual Property + Media Practice Groups, focuses on intellectual property (IP) counseling and litigation, advertising disputes and challenges, and complex commercial disputes. Marc’s experience spans the full range of IP, including trademark…

Marc Rachman, a partner in the Litigation + Dispute Resolution and Intellectual Property + Media Practice Groups, focuses on intellectual property (IP) counseling and litigation, advertising disputes and challenges, and complex commercial disputes. Marc’s experience spans the full range of IP, including trademark, copyright, false advertising, rights of publicity, trade secret and patent infringement disputes. He helps clients of all sizes assess, protect and optimize the value of their intellectual property.

Insightful and pragmatic, with a deep knowledge of his clients’ businesses and industries, Marc gets to the root of a matter quickly with strategic insight and practical solutions. His experience as a media planner before pursuing his legal career gives him a unique perspective when advising on advertising and media matters. Marc represents industry-leading advertising and marketing, financial services, digital media and adtech businesses, world-renowned entertainers, small businesses, and technology startups, among others.

Marc works closely with clients to assert and defend IP infringement claims, provides pre-litigation and litigation avoidance counseling, and advises on the use of IP in advertising, marketing and promotions. He has an impressive record in prosecuting and defending cases, and his knowledge of the courts and the alternative dispute resolution process helps him guide clients in deciding when to fight and when to settle. He is exceptionally swift and effective in resolving IP matters in court, before the USPTO and its Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and at the negotiating table.

Marc’s experience extends to copyright disputes concerning music, photo, pictorial, sculptural and literary works. He has also worked on trademark matters relating to word and design marks, trade dress, and nontraditional trademarks — including sounds and product designs — as well as celebrity images and personas. In recent years, he has been a driving force in developing and building the firm’s niche practice in defending graffiti art copyright infringement claims.

Marc has helped several celebrity clients address online reputation management issues. He also has extensive experience handling complex commercial disputes involving the enforcement of advertising agency-client agreements, digital advertising sales agreements, partnership dissolutions, employment terminations, and restrictive covenants and real estate leasing disputes.

Read more about Marc J. Rachman of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailMarc's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLP

Brooke Erdos Singer helps clients achieve brand success, coordinating the myriad of trademark, contract, advertising and marketing issues businesses face. She advises a wide variety of U.S. and international clients that range from startups to celebrities and iconic brands. 

Brooke takes a 360-degree…

Brooke Erdos Singer helps clients achieve brand success, coordinating the myriad of trademark, contract, advertising and marketing issues businesses face. She advises a wide variety of U.S. and international clients that range from startups to celebrities and iconic brands. 

Brooke takes a 360-degree view of brands, and is often involved at the outset of product or campaign development. Because she combines counseling, transactional and litigation experience, Brooke is able to anticipate how creative decisions may play out in various scenarios. Clients rely on her for guidance on trademark clearance, prosecution, portfolio management, brand monetization, brand protection and enforcement. Acting as an integral member of the client’s team, she is a valued early reviewer who can spot risk and find commercially viable alternatives when needed. In addition, her insights help clients navigate international legal and cultural issues in marketing campaigns.

Clients appreciate Brooke’s practical, eyes-on-the-prize approach. She is creative and flexible and doesn’t get mired in nonessential details. Whether the matter involves a professional service agreement, a talent contract or a trademark license, Brooke keeps her clients’ priorities and interests firmly at the forefront.

In the event of disputes, Brooke works closely with the firm’s litigation team to craft compelling arguments or early resolutions that are consistent with her client’s overall goals.

Knowledgeable, reliable, candid, efficient and practical, Brooke makes each client feel seen, heard and well represented. She works extensively in the advertising, entertainment, fashion and beauty, food and restaurant, and gaming industries.

Read more about Brooke Erdos Singer of Davis+Gilbert LLPEmailBrooke's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo