Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

New CJEU Decision on Use of Cookies

By Carsten A. Kociok on October 4, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
shutterstock_271646561

On October 1, 2019 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a new judgment on the use of cookies which, under the EU E-Privacy Directive, requires users’ informed consent. The court decided that

  • the cookies consent cannot be obtained by using a pre-ticked consent checkbox; and
  • information must be provided to users which includes the duration of the operation of cookies and whether third parties may have access to the cookies.

Background

The case relates to a legal dispute between a German consumer protection organization and an organizer of online lotteries. The lottery organizer used various marketing cookies on its website for which it obtained the website users’ consent by way of a pre-checked checkbox that users could deselect if they did not wish to agree to such cookies. The consumer protection organization claimed that the way the cookies consent was obtained was not compliant with EU legislation.

In this context, the German Supreme Court submitted two questions to the CJEU. The first question pertains to the method of how cookies consent can be obtained. The second question seeks guidance on the scope of information that should be provided to website users.

CJEU’s Considerations

What type of consent?

The CJEU’s answer to the first question is straightforward. The CJEU concludes that consent must be active, informed and unambiguous (which is also in line with the definition of consent under the GDPR). The court then states that the use of a pre-ticked checkbox makes it impossible to ascertain whether a user has given consent in such manner. The court notes it is not inconceivable that a user might not have read the information accompanying the pre-selected checkbox, or might not have even noticed the checkbox.

Based on this, the CJEU concludes that consent will not be valid if provided by way of a pre-checked checkbox which the user must deselect to show he or she does not agree.

What information must be provided?

In relation to the second question, the CJEU concludes that information must be provided on the duration of the operation of cookies because a long or even unlimited duration could lead to the collection of a large amount of information on the user’s surfing behavior and how often they visit the websites.

In addition, information must also be given on whether or not third parties may have access to the information collected by the cookies, given that the relevant EU provisions expressly refer to information about the recipients or categories of recipients of the data.

Against this background, the CJEU concludes that the cookies information that a website operator must give to its users includes the duration of the operation of cookies and whether or not third parties may have access to the information collected by the cookies.

Conclusion

It is important to note that the CJEU’s decision was based on a company using marketing/tracking cookies and that under the E-Privacy Directive no consent is required where strictly necessary cookies are used (cookies necessary to “make the website work” or cookies used to provide services the user explicitly requests). However, in other instances where cookies are used, active, informed and unambiguous consent must be obtained which implies that a website user must carry out an active and confirmative action.

The use of a pre-checked checkbox which allows the user to refuse consent by way of deselection does not comply with these requirements. The use of a non-checked checkbox, on the other hand, should generally be sufficient. In addition, information must be given on the duration of the operation of cookies; and whether or not third parties may have access to the information collected by these cookies.

Outlook

The CJEU’s judgment is consistent with the increasingly stringent regulations regarding the use of cookies in several EU member states. The new e-Privacy Regulation will likely bring more clarification on this issue.

We will keep you updated on further developments. In the meantime, we will gladly answer any questions you might have on this subject matter.

Photo of Carsten A. Kociok Carsten A. Kociok

Carsten Kociok is a partner in the Technology, Financial Services and Data Privacy Practice in Berlin and Co-Head of Greenberg Traurig’s global Fintech Group. He advises national and international clients across all industries, including financial services, information technology, artificial intelligence, ecommerce, media, health

…

Carsten Kociok is a partner in the Technology, Financial Services and Data Privacy Practice in Berlin and Co-Head of Greenberg Traurig’s global Fintech Group. He advises national and international clients across all industries, including financial services, information technology, artificial intelligence, ecommerce, media, health care, telecoms, retail and real estate, on a wide variety of complex commercial and regulatory matters.

Carsten is a leading technology lawyer, ranked consistently in Band 1 for Fintech Legal in Germany since 2020. He has in-depth and wide-ranging experience in the areas of privacy and cybersecurity, payments law, financial services, e-money products, blockchain technology, and financial and banking regulation, as well as in artificial intelligence regulation – including compliance with the EU AI Act – and the integration of AI technologies into existing software systems.

Carsten regularly assists clients in licensing projects and audit proceedings with financial regulators and advises on the contractual and regulatory aspects of developing, implementing and operating financial technology products and transactions.

On the data privacy side, Carsten counsels clients on complex data-driven business models and regulatory matters, including on international data transfers, data privacy compliance, monetization of data, artificial intelligence, litigation, cybersecurity and data breach response.

Carsten regularly lectures and publishes on various FinTech and data privacy topics. Prior to joining the firm, Carsten worked at Olswang Germany for eight years and in the Capital Transaction Practice Group of an international law firm in New York.

Read more about Carsten A. KociokEmailCarsten's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Blog:
    Data Privacy Dish
  • Organization:
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo