Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Leaders of the SEC, CFTC, and FinCEN Issue Joint Statement Emphasizing AML Obligations for Digital Asset Activities

By Jean Veta & Nikhil Gore on October 14, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On Friday, the leaders of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) (collectively, the “Agencies”) issued a “Joint Statement on Activities Involving Digital Assets” (the “Joint Statement”).  The Joint Statement serves as a reminder that businesses engaged in activities involving digital assets – or, as they are sometimes called, virtual currencies or cryptocurrencies – should be attentive to their anti-money laundering (“AML”) obligations, including under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”).

The Joint Statement notes that the BSA requires “financial institutions” to:  (1) establish and implement an effective AML program; and (2) comply with certain recordkeeping and reporting requirements, including the filing of suspicious activity reports (“SARs”).  These requirements apply not just to a financial institution’s traditional lines of businesses, but also to its businesses involving digital assets.

The Joint Statement explains that, among others, the following types of entities are “financial institutions” subject to obligations under the BSA:

  • Broker-dealers and mutual funds required to register with the SEC;
  • Futures commission merchants and introducing brokers required to register with the CFTC; and
  • Money services businesses (“MSBs”) as defined by FinCEN.

While observing “market participants refer to digital assets using many different labels,” the Joint Statement applies to the full range of “digital assets,” including those that qualify as securities, commodities, or security- or commodity-based instruments, such as futures or swaps.

According to the Joint Statement, the regulatory treatment of any particular digital asset activity will be dictated by “the facts and circumstances underlying [the] asset, activity or service, including . . . economic reality and use.”  These facts and circumstances are also “key factor[s]” in determining whether a company must register with the CFTC, FinCEN, or the SEC.  For covered financial institutions, BSA compliance will be overseen by one or more of the Agencies.  SEC or CFTC registrants will, in addition, also generally be overseen by a self-regulatory organization, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) or the National Futures Association (“NFA”).

The Joint Statement emphasizes that, for certain companies overseen by the SEC or CFTC, BSA obligations will apply to transactions regardless of the type of digital asset involved.  As an example, the SEC generally regulates “securities” and “security-based swaps,” and not “commodities” or commodity derivatives contracts.  However, if an SEC-registered broker-dealer enters into transactions in a digital asset that is treated as a “commodity” or convertible virtual currency (“CVC”) (such as Bitcoin), the BSA obligations for broker-dealers would still apply to those transactions.

The Joint Statement is notable for cutting across the complicated interpretive questions that digital asset activities present, and for reflecting a harmonized approach across all three federal agencies that have been most active in regulating digital assets.

In recent months and years, FinCEN, the SEC, and the CFTC have all been active in addressing the regulatory treatment of digital asset activities.  Previous guidance and enforcement activities, however, have tended to focus on the Agencies’ particular spheres of jurisdiction.  As just a few examples:

  • FinCEN in May 2019 released interpretive guidance regarding MSB business models that involve CVCs (we described this guidance in detail at the time). In addition, FinCEN has recently brought enforcement actions against financial institutions and individuals for allegedly failing to meet their Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) obligations with respect to digital assets.
  • The SEC in April 2019 issued a statement regarding when digital assets would be considered to meet the definition of “securities” under federal law; and
  • The CFTC in May 2018 published an advisory that provides guidance to CFTC registrants for listing commodity derivatives contracts based on underlying digital assets.

In contrast, the upshot of the Joint Statement is to emphasize that, regardless of its primary regulator, any financial institution engaged in digital asset activities may face AML obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), which the Agencies will expect the financial institution to meet.

Photo of Jean Veta Jean Veta

Jean Veta is described by Chambers USA as “one of the premier banking and financial regulatory enforcement litigators in the country.” She defends financial institutions and their officers and directors in civil and regulatory enforcement matters, government investigations, internal corporate investigations, and congressional…

Jean Veta is described by Chambers USA as “one of the premier banking and financial regulatory enforcement litigators in the country.” She defends financial institutions and their officers and directors in civil and regulatory enforcement matters, government investigations, internal corporate investigations, and congressional investigations.
Jean regularly represents clients on the full range of regulatory enforcement issues, including:

advising on safety and soundness issues, UDAAP and other consumer compliance issues, fair lending, anti-money laundering, securities issues, and FIRREA and False Claims Act investigations.
appearing before the federal bank regulators, the CFPB, FinCEN, the Department of Justice, the SEC, and state attorneys general and bank regulators.

Jean’s pro bono work includes:

filing amicus briefs on behalf of over 20 professional medical associations in opposition to state laws that would ban gender affirming medical care for transgender adolescents. Amici include the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, and the American Psychiatric Association.
filing an amicus brief in support of transgender students’ rights. Amici include the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Medical Association.
representing civil rights organizations, an interfaith group of clergy, and four same-sex couples in support of Washington DC’s marriage equality.
representing pro-choice organizations in Congressional investigations into fetal tissue research and late-term abortion.

Jean is ranked in Chambers USA’s Band 1 for Banking Enforcement and Investigations. She was named by The American Lawyer as Litigator of the Week and by Best Lawyers in America as “Washington’s Lawyer of the Year for Banking and Finance Litigation” and “Washington’s Lawyer of the Year for Financial Services Regulatory Law.”

Jean serves as a Commissioner on the American Bar Association’s Commission on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Previously, Jean was a member of the ABA’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which provides an impartial evaluation of the professional qualifications of all federal judicial nominees. As the Standing Committee’s representative for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Jean served as a principal evaluator of then Supreme Court nominee, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s professional qualifications to serve on the Court. Jean testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding Justice Jackson’s integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament. On April 7, 2022, Justice Jackson was confirmed by the Senate to replace Justice Stephen Breyer.

Jean also serves as the DC Bar’s Delegate to the ABA House of Delegates.

During President Clinton’s administration, Jean served as:

Deputy Associate Attorney General, United States Department of Justice (2000-2001)
Deputy General Counsel, United States Department of Education (1998-2000)

As described in Chambers USA, one client said “She’s at the top of her game and top of the industry. She has a keen intellect, and a commanding knowledge of the law, excellent judgment and a passion for zealous representation of her client. You can do no better than to have Jean on your side. She’s the leader in her field.”

Read more about Jean VetaEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Nikhil Gore Nikhil Gore

Nikhil V. Gore represents financial institutions, sovereigns, and global corporations in investigations, disputes, and regulatory advocacy before U.S. and international financial services regulators.

As co-chair of Covington’s financial services investigations and government enforcement practice, Nikhil leads anti-financial crime investigations, as well as a…

Nikhil V. Gore represents financial institutions, sovereigns, and global corporations in investigations, disputes, and regulatory advocacy before U.S. and international financial services regulators.

As co-chair of Covington’s financial services investigations and government enforcement practice, Nikhil leads anti-financial crime investigations, as well as a wide range of financial institution governance, control, safety and soundness, and consumer and market conduct matters. He has served as lead counsel for multiple major financial institutions in safety-and-soundness matters before the OCC and Federal Reserve; secured unprecedented outcomes for community banks challenging FDIC supervisory and enforcement actions; and represented global banking institutions in anti-financial crime investigations in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East.

Nikhil also counsels clients on a range of financial statutes and regulations, including those governing U.S. fiscal law and the investment and payment authorities of government agencies; the control of money laundering and the licensing of money transmission; and the combatting of terrorist financing.

In his disputes practice, Nikhil is part of the Covington team representing Ukraine in state-to-state arbitrations against the Russian Federation and was appointed by the Prosecutor-General of Ukraine to the Legal Task Force on Accountability for Russian War Crimes. He has handled treaty arbitrations and commercial disputes spanning Asia, Eastern Europe, North America, the Middle East, and Africa.

Read more about Nikhil GoreEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Banking, Finance and Securities
  • Blog:
    Cov Financial Services
  • Organization:
    Covington & Burling LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo