Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

California Revises Its Hemp Cultivation Laws

By Sarah Blitz on October 15, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
cannabis gavel

On October 12, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Senate Bill (SB) 153, a bill aimed at supplementing existing laws governing industrial hemp and conforming California’s hemp law to the requirements for a state plan under the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018 (Farm Bill).

Notable provisions of SB-153 include:

  • A requirement that the Secretary of the California Department of Food & Agriculture, in consultation with the governor and the Attorney General, develop and submit a state plan on industrial hemp to the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) on or before May 1, 2020.
  • A slightly modified definition of “Industrial hemp” and “Hemp” to mean “an agricultural product, whether growing or not, that is limited to types of the plant Cannabis sativa L. and any part of that plant, including the seeds of the plant and all derivatives, extracts, the resin extracted from any part of the plant, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts of isomers, with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of no more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.”
  • Registration requirements for commercial and non-commercial growers.
  • A narrowing of the definition of established agricultural research institutions to be more consistent with federal law.
  • A clarification that licensed cannabis premises may not cultivate hemp. Hemp cultivated in a licensed premise will be considered cannabis.
  • The addition of enforcement provisions and penalties for false statements on applications as well as a bar on participating in the industrial hemp program for individuals with a conviction relating to controlled substances within the prior 10-year period.
  • An expansion of the composition of the Industrial Hemp Advisory Board to include more industry stakeholders.

Despite being signed into law, questions remain regarding SB-153. First, it is unclear from the text of SB-153 when specific provisions will take effect. Second, the California Department of Food and Agriculture has yet to promulgate official guidance regarding compliance. Finally, USDA’s interim final rules on hemp production have not yet been approved by the White House. Depending on what minimums the USDA sets, portions of SB-153 may be pre-empted. We’ll continue to track developments regarding the implementation of SB-153 and USDA’s final rules here and provide updates accordingly.

Photo of Sarah Blitz Sarah Blitz

Sarah Blitz is an associate in the Business Trial Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles office and leader of the firm’s Cannabis industry team.

Read more about Sarah BlitzEmail
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo