Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Sears Wants It’s Money Back… Debtor Filing Preference Complaints Against Trade Creditors

By Thomas S. Onder on November 8, 2019
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

This past week, Chapter 11 debtor Sears Holdings Corporation (“Sears”) filed hundreds of preference complaints to recover money from paid pre-petition creditors.

For most creditors, it must seem odd to be receiving a complaint to return money for goods or services sold prior to October 15, 2018 (the date when Sears filed for bankruptcy protection). However, the practice of recovering “preferences” in bankruptcy is allowed by federal statute – 11 U.S.C. 547. Before you go a writing a check to Sears, know what defenses you have against this statutory claim.

What is “Preference”?

A “preference” is a payment received from a debtor, made within 90 days of the bankruptcy filing.  Bankruptcy Code section 547(b) allows a bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession to avoid these payments, if the transfers were to, or for, the benefit of a creditor on account of an antecedent debt while the debtor was insolvent. When Congress enacted the Bankruptcy Code, “preferences” were meant to level the playing field for all creditors by preventing a creditor from receiving more money than it would have within the debtor’s bankruptcy case.

The Bankruptcy Code provides the trustee or debtor-in-possession the power to recover these transfers. However, you may have certain defenses, including: payments made within the ordinary course of business; new value provided for the debt; payments made outside of the 90-day preference period; settlements during the bankruptcy case; and/or payments made via C.O.D.

Gather Information From Your Client

To determine if you have any defenses, it is critical that you analyze the full payment history at least one year before the bankruptcy filing. This information includes:

  1. All correspondence, contracts, emails, and the like with the debtor
  2. A copy of all invoices showing invoice date, terms, and amount of each invoice;
  3. A copy of the payments received (i.e. checks, wires, cash deposit slip) and date posted to your client’s bank account;
  4. The number of days elapsed between the invoice date and the date payment was received; and
  5. Personnel involved with the debtor’s account so they can advise how payments were made, applied and any unique issues with the debtor.

It is critical to properly analyze this information and formulate a corresponding response to reduce or even eliminate preference exposure.

If you received a preference complaint and/or demand, Stark & Stark’s Shopping Center & Retail Development Group can help.

Our bankruptcy attorneys regularly represent landlords throughout the country, including recently in the Eastern District of Missouri, District of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, District of Delaware, District of Minnesota, and the Western and Eastern Districts of Pennsylvania regarding a variety of issues.

Our Group has been counsel to landlords and trade creditors in the Mattress Firm, Toys “R” Us, Payless, Eastern Outfitters (EMS Part 2), EMS, Golfsmith, RadioShack, General Wireless (RadioShack 2), Gander Mountain, A&P, Joyce Leslie, rue21, Central Grocers, and Sports Authority chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

For more information on how Stark & Stark can assist you, please contact Thomas Onder, Shareholder, at (609) 219-7458 or tonder@stark-stark.com or Joseph Lemkin at (609) 791-7022 or jlemkin@stark-stark.com.

Photo of Thomas S. Onder Thomas S. Onder

Thomas S. Onder is a Shareholder and Chair of the Shopping Center & Retail Development Group, as well as a member of the Real Estate, Litigation, and Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights Groups of Stark & Stark.

Mr. Onder is active in the International…

Thomas S. Onder is a Shareholder and Chair of the Shopping Center & Retail Development Group, as well as a member of the Real Estate, Litigation, and Bankruptcy & Creditors’ Rights Groups of Stark & Stark.

Mr. Onder is active in the International Council of Shopping Centers (“ICSC”) and concentrates his practice in the area of commercial leasing and litigation, focusing in commercial landlord disputes and secured transactions before state and federal courts in New York and New Jersey, as well as the Federal Claims Court in Washington, DC.

Read more about Thomas S. OnderEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Bankruptcy
  • Blog:
    New Jersey Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Stark & Stark
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo