Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

AFL-CIO Asks Federal Court to Overturn New NLRB Election Rule

By Jonathan J. Spitz & Thomas V. Walsh on March 10, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

As expected, the nation’s largest labor organization, the AFL-CIO, has filed suit in the Washington, D.C., federal court to stay implementation of, and ultimately invalidate, the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) expansive election rule amendments. The rule changes, scheduled for April 16, have been widely panned by labor advocates.  

The suit primarily argues the NLRB rushed issuance of the new rule, mischaracterizing the amendments as simply “procedural” in nature to avoid the lengthy public notice-and-comment period required for “substantive” regulations.  

The issue is legally murky, but the AFL-CIO has chosen a court with a track record favorable to their position.  

We will continue to monitor developments and provide updates on this case.

 

Photo of Jonathan J. Spitz Jonathan J. Spitz

Jonathan J. Spitz is a principal in the Atlanta, Georgia, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. and co-leader of the firm’s Labor Relations practice group.

Read more about Jonathan J. SpitzEmail
Photo of Thomas V. Walsh Thomas V. Walsh
Read more about Thomas V. WalshEmail
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Labor & Collective Bargaining
  • Organization:
    Jackson Lewis P.C.

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo