Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Department of Labor Continues to Update FAQ Concerning Families First Coronavirus Response Act

By Salvatore G. Gangemi & Patricia E. Reilly on March 31, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The federal Department of Labor (DOL) continues to update its Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) FAQ leading up to the April 1, 2020 implementation. Over the past week, the DOL has supplemented the FFCRA FAQ several times to provide guidance and clarifications concerning lingering questions. Some of the recent clarifications we find helpful are below.

Documentation to support emergency FMLA or paid sick leave. According to the DOL, employees must provide employers with documentation to support emergency FMLA or Paid Sick Leave (PSL). The FFCRA is silent about verifying leave requests, so any guidance is useful. For example, an employee would need to provide a quarantine or isolation order if taking leave for that reason, or a school notice advising of a closure.

Notably, the DOL states an employer is “not required to provide leave if materials sufficient to support the applicable tax credit have not been provided.”

The DOL advises employers to retain employee-provided documentation if they will claim tax credits under FFCRA. The IRS will apparently issue applicable forms and instructions with additional information.

The DOL also advises that “all existing certification requirements under the FMLA remain in effect if you are taking leave for one of the existing qualifying reasons under the FMLA. For example, if you are taking leave beyond the two weeks of emergency paid sick leave because your medical condition for COVID-19-related reasons rises to the level of a serious health condition, you must continue to provide medical certifications under the FMLA if required by your employer.”

When is someone unable to telework? The emergency FMLA and PSL qualifying events generally require that an employee must be unable to work or telework to qualify for FFCRA leave. The DOL states an employee is unable to telework when an employer provides the employee with work that can be performed at home, but the employee can’t do the work because of one of the FFCRA qualifying reasons. This would include taking care of a child because of a school or child care closure, although the DOL cautions, “to the extent you are able to telework while caring for your child, paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave is not available.”

Note the DOL also states that an employee can telework where the employee and the employer agree that the employee can work the normal number of hours, but outside of the normally scheduled hour (e.g., early in the morning or late at night).

How are “Health Care Provider” and “Emergency Responder” interpreted? The FFCRA allows employers to exempt “health care provider” and “emergency responder” employees from the emergency FMLA and PSL benefits. FFCRA, however, does not define either term.

The DOL takes an expansive view of “health care provider” for purposes of the exemption as “anyone employed at any doctor’s office, hospital, health care center, clinic, post-secondary educational institution offering health care instruction, medical school, local health department or agency, nursing facility, retirement facility, nursing home, home health care provider, any facility that performs laboratory or medical testing, pharmacy, or any similar institution, employer, or entity. This includes any permanent or temporary institution, facility, location, or site where medical services are provided that are similar to such institutions.” The definition includes “any individual employed by an entity that contracts with any of the above institutions, employers, or entities institutions to provide services or to maintain the operation of the facility. This also includes anyone employed by any entity that provides medical services, produces medical products, or is otherwise involved in the making of COVID-19 related medical equipment, tests, drugs, vaccines, diagnostic vehicles, or treatments. This also includes any individual that the highest official of a state or territory, including the District of Columbia, determines is a health care provider necessary for that state’s or territory’s or the District of Columbia’s response to COVID-19.”

The DOL defines “emergency responder” as “an employee who is necessary for the provision of transport, care, health care, comfort, and nutrition of such patients, or whose services are otherwise needed to limit the spread of COVID-19. This includes but is not limited to military or national guard, law enforcement officers, correctional institution personnel, fire fighters, emergency medical services personnel, physicians, nurses, public health personnel, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, emergency management personnel, 911 operators, public works personnel, and persons with skills or training in operating specialized equipment or other skills needed to provide aid in a declared emergency as well as individuals who work for such facilities employing these individuals and whose work is necessary to maintain the operation of the facility. This also includes any individual that the highest official of a state or territory, including the District of Columbia, determines is an emergency responder necessary for that state’s or territory’s or the District of Columbia’s response to COVID-19.”

When does the small business exception apply? Employers with fewer than 50 employees are exempt from providing emergency FMLA or PSL if doing so would jeopardize the viability of the small business as a going concern. A small business may claim this exemption if an “authorized officer” of the business has determined that:

  1. The provision of paid sick leave or expanded family and medical leave would result in the small business’s expenses and financial obligations exceeding available business revenues and cause the small business to cease operating at a minimal capacity;
  2. The absence of the employee or employees requesting paid sick leave or expanded family and medical leave would entail a substantial risk to the financial health or operational capabilities of the small business because of their specialized skills, knowledge of the business, or responsibilities; or
  3. There are not sufficient workers who are able, willing, and qualified, and who will be available at the time and place needed, to perform the labor or services provided by the employee or employees requesting paid sick leave or expanded family and medical leave, and these labor or services are needed for the small business to operate at a minimal capacity.

Until further notice, employers claiming this exemption should document their decision-making process and hold pending further instruction. Do not submit any documents to the DOL.

Intermittent use of PSL or emergency FML. Generally, employees may use emergency FMLA intermittently when teleworking. If, however, an employee is working at the employer’s place of business, the employee may only use intermittent leave with the employer’s permission.

As for PSL, unless an employee is teleworking, PSL must be taken in full-day increments. Practically speaking, employees may only use intermittent emergency PSL if they are caring for a child whose school or daycare provider is closed because of COVID-19 reasons.

Layoffs, Furloughs, and Closures. If an employer closes a worksite on or after April 1 (the FFCRA effective date), but before an employee goes out on leave, the employee is not entitled to PSL or emergency FMLA leave. That point seemed clear prior to the DOL’s guidance.

  • What happens when an employer closes an employee’s worksite while the employer is on protected FFCRA leave? The employer must pay the employee for benefits used before the employer closed, but as of the date of the worksite closure the employer is no longer liable for FFCRA benefits. This remains true even where the employer intends on reopening in the future.
  • Are furloughed employees entitled to FFCRA benefits?? The DOL says “no.”
  • If an employer reduces an employee’s work schedule, can the employee use PSL or emergency FMLA to make up the hours he or she is no longer scheduled to work? No, because the employee is not prevented from working those hours due to a COVID-19 qualifying reason.

Supplementing FFCRA Paid Leave.  The DOL says that, absent employer-employee agreement, an employee cannot use preexisting leave entitlements and FFCRA leave at the same time so that the employee can make up the gap between capped FFCRA paid leave and his or her normal wages. Unless an employer agrees to such use, the employee must choose one type of leave. If the employer does allow an employee to supplement FFCRA leave with preexisting leave entitlements, an employer won’t be eligible for FFCRA tax credits on the supplemental paid leave (only the FFCRA paid leave).

Also note that an employer cannot force an employee to supplement FFCRA paid leave with existing paid leave. Any supplement must be agreed upon.

Regular FMLA remains unpaid. The DOL clarified that the only type of paid leave per the Family and Medical Leave Act is the single scenario identified in the FFCRA, i.e., an employee must care for a child whose school or place of care is closed, or child care provider is unavailable due to COVID-19 reasons. So, the usual FMLA qualifying events remain unpaid job-protected leave. Of course, employers must still consider the FFCRA’s emergency PSL.

In addition to the above, please note that your state may provide additional leave beyond that required by the FFCRA.

Murtha Cullina’s Labor and Employment Group continues to monitor the situation, including the release of additional DOL guidance.  If you have any questions, please contact a member of the Labor and Employment Group.

Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.

Read more about Salvatore G. GangemiEmailSalvatore G.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Patricia E. Reilly Patricia E. Reilly

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before…

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the EEOC, the Connecticut Department of Labor, and the U.S. Department of Labor. Whether resolving a matter pre-litigation or litigating a case to trial, Tricia uses her first-rate strategic litigation skills to advocate for her clients’ interests. She works closely with her clients to ensure that the litigation is executed with the highest degree of skill and professionalism.

In addition to maintaining a thriving litigation practice, Tricia advises clients on a wide range of employment law matters, including sexual harassment and discrimination avoidance; disability and pregnancy accommodation; FMLA; wage and hour compliance; and trade secrets and restrictive covenants. She also provides training and presents on labor and employment issues, particularly sexual harassment prevention.  Tricia represents clients in a wide range of industries and sectors, including education (colleges, universities and independent schools), health care, financial services, retail, food and beverage, transportation services, energy, and manufacturing.

Tricia is listed as a leading Labor and Employment Lawyer in Chambers USA. In addition, she is listed in Best Lawyers in America®. In 2017 and 2020, Best Lawyers in America® recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven, Litigation – Labor and Employment, and in 2020 Best Lawyers also recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven Employment Law – Management.  In 2019 and 2020, Super Lawyers listed Tricia among the Top 25 Women Attorneys in Connecticut.

Read more about Patricia E. ReillyEmailPatricia E.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Murtha Cullina LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo