Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Five PTAB Decisions on Printed Publications Designated Precedential or Informative

By Brooke M. Wilner on April 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Late last year, the PTAB’s Precedential Opinion Panel clarified that in an IPR, it is the petitioner’s burden to show a reasonable likelihood that an asserted reference qualifies as a printed publication. See Hulu, LLC v. Sound View Innovations, LLC, IPR2018-01039, Paper 29 (Dec. 20, 2019) (designated precedential Dec. 20, 2019). On April 7, the PTAB further clarified what evidence can meet that burden. One decision, designated precedential, discusses what is required to show a reference is a printed publication in the examination context. Four other decisions, designated informative, shed light on how a petitioner in an IPR can successfully show a reference is a printed publication.

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    AIA Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo