Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Department of Labor Updates Families First Coronavirus Response Act Q&A Guidance on Calculating Leave Entitlements

By Salvatore G. Gangemi & Patricia E. Reilly on April 22, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

For the last several weeks, the Department of Labor has periodically updated its Families First Coronavirus Response Act: (FFCRA) “Questions and Answers” page by illustrating real-world applications of the FFCRA.  We covered previous updates on March 31, 2020 and March 25, 2020.  The most recent updates – questions 80-88 – illustrate common issues in computing employee hour and pay entitlements under the FFCRA, among others.

Computing employee sick leave hours:

The FFCRA entitles employees to 2 weeks of paid sick leave (up to 80 hours) based on the number of hours they are regularly scheduled to work.  While regular full-time employees don’t require a calculation, what about employees with variable schedules?

  1. Estimate the number of hours based on the 6-month period immediately prior to the beginning of sick leave.
  2. Use the average number of hours per calendar day, not work day.
  3. The average must include all scheduled hours, i.e., “hours actually worked and hours for which the employee took leave.”
  4. If an employee began work less than 6 months before FFCRA sick leave, the employer should use the entirety of the employee’s tenure to estimate their hours.

The same 6-month lookback principle applies to calculating an employee’s hourly entitlement to Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion Act (EFMLEA) leave, under which an employee is entitled to 2/3 pay of their estimated hours per day.

Computing employee average regular rate:

FFCRA paid leave is based on the employee’s average regular rate.  Again, for employees with consistent hours and salary or wage, the average rate is either the employee’s “hourly wage or the hourly-equivalent of their salary.”  Complications arise with tips, commissions, and overtime premiums.  The DOL advises the following steps.

  1. Calculate “the employee’s non-excludable remuneration for each full workweek during the six-month period.” Commissions, piece-rate pay, and tips (to the extent they count towards minimum wage obligations) are included.  Tips above minimum wage obligations and overtime premiums are excluded.  Unlike the hours calculation above, leave time payments are excluded for the regular rate calculation.
  2. Compute all hours actually worked over the 6-month lookback period (again, exclusive of compensated leave time).
  3. To get the average regular rate, divide all non-excludable income by all hours actually worked.

For employees who are paid fixed salaries with variable hours, the regular rate would depend on the hours worked each week.  Where hourly records are unavailable, employers should use a “reasonable estimate.”

Rounding hours is permissible, so long as it is done so consistently.

The 6-month lookback period is always the 6 months immediately preceding sick leave regardless of any prior PTO, FMLA, or EFMLEA leave taken during that time frame.

When employers may require utilization of preexisting, accrued paid time off:

  • Employers cannot require the use of accrued paid time off available under their policies during FFCRA paid sick leave.
  • Employers may require that an employee take accrued paid time off “available to an employee under the employer’s policies” concurrently with paid EFMLEA leave. Subject to employer requirement or employee election, the employee is entitled to the full amount of pay provided for under a paid leave policy predating April 1, 2020.  However, the employer can only receive tax credits equal to the EFMLEA pay entitlement (i.e., 2/3 of the employee’s regular pay up to $200/day).
  • Employers and employees may agree to supplement EFMLEA pay with accrued paid time off.
  • If an employee exhausts accrued paid leave, but has more EFMLEA time available, then the employee will receive EFMLEA pay subject to the maximum limits permitted for such leave.

Paid leave subject to stay-at-home, shelter-in-place, quarantine, and isolation orders:

For purposes of the FFCRA, all of the above orders are effectively the same.  But,

  1. The order must be the reason the employee cannot work, or telework, and
  2. If the employer has no work for the employee to perform, paid leave is unavailable.

Please contact the Murtha labor and employment team for assistance with implementing the DOL’s rolling FFCRA guidance.

Photo of Salvatore G. Gangemi Salvatore G. Gangemi

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction…

Salvatore G. Gangemi, a partner at Murtha Cullina, is a veteran labor and employment lawyer with nearly 30 years of litigation and counseling experience.

Employers from across the industry spectrum, including established companies in the senior living and health care fields; manufacturing, construction, retail and service firms; and emerging companies, seek Sal’s legal counsel to navigate today’s complex local, state and federal employment laws. His practice includes resolving disputes; advocating in courts and before administrative agencies; counseling on employment-related issues arising from acquisitions; and guiding clients in both long-range strategy and day-to-day administration of their workplaces and employees.

At the federal level, Sal brings extensive experience in OSHA investigations, audits and proceedings; the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA); Title VII discrimination matters; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); and the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA). He is also well-versed in state and local employment regulations.

Sal regularly represents clients in matters before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal agencies. On the state level, he appears before the New York State Division of Human Rights; the New York City Commission on Human Rights; the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; the Connecticut Department of Labor; and the New York State Department of Labor. He has litigated cases involving misappropriation of trade secrets, restrictive covenants, breach of employment contract, fiduciary duty and other work-related common law claims.

Clients rely on Sal’s advice on routine human resources matters that arise in their businesses, including requests for reasonable accommodation for those with disabilities, family and medical leave issues, hiring and termination, and wage and hour concerns. Known for his proactive approach to identifying issues before they escalate, he conducts compliance training on sexual harassment prevention and other topics, performs worker classification practice and policy audits, and drafts employment policies and agreements. Sal shares his knowledge of the ever-evolving employment law landscape by speaking at events, conducting continuing legal education seminars and writing articles for a variety of publications.

Read more about Salvatore G. GangemiEmailSalvatore G.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Patricia E. Reilly Patricia E. Reilly

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before…

Patricia E. Reilly, a partner at Murtha Cullina, serves as chair of  the firm’s Labor & Employment practice and co-chair of the Education practice.

She litigates employment, wage and hour, and restrictive covenant cases in state and federal courts. She also appears before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, the EEOC, the Connecticut Department of Labor, and the U.S. Department of Labor. Whether resolving a matter pre-litigation or litigating a case to trial, Tricia uses her first-rate strategic litigation skills to advocate for her clients’ interests. She works closely with her clients to ensure that the litigation is executed with the highest degree of skill and professionalism.

In addition to maintaining a thriving litigation practice, Tricia advises clients on a wide range of employment law matters, including sexual harassment and discrimination avoidance; disability and pregnancy accommodation; FMLA; wage and hour compliance; and trade secrets and restrictive covenants. She also provides training and presents on labor and employment issues, particularly sexual harassment prevention.  Tricia represents clients in a wide range of industries and sectors, including education (colleges, universities and independent schools), health care, financial services, retail, food and beverage, transportation services, energy, and manufacturing.

Tricia is listed as a leading Labor and Employment Lawyer in Chambers USA. In addition, she is listed in Best Lawyers in America®. In 2017 and 2020, Best Lawyers in America® recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven, Litigation – Labor and Employment, and in 2020 Best Lawyers also recognized her as “Lawyer of the Year” for New Haven Employment Law – Management.  In 2019 and 2020, Super Lawyers listed Tricia among the Top 25 Women Attorneys in Connecticut.

Read more about Patricia E. ReillyEmailPatricia E.'s Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Employment Law Perspectives
  • Organization:
    Murtha Cullina LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo