Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

SEC Issues Guidance on Interplay Between Form S-3 and Relief Under COVID-19 Order

By Stacie Aarestad on May 8, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
https-ipo-foleyhoag-com-wp-content-uploads-sites-15-2020-05-for-blog-jpg

As many companies consider the need to raise capital, the SEC has provided FAQs that address how taking advantage of the relief provided under the COVID-19 Order may impact offerings of securities using Form S‑3.  As described in our prior posts, the SEC has granted conditional relief to allow reporting companies to delay filings required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 due on or before July 1, 2020.

Q:        If a company delays a required filing under the COVID-19 Order, can it use an existing, effective Form S-3 for an offering of securities?

A:        Yes, but with some caveats:

  • Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 still requires that information in the registration statement not be more than 16 months old, if such information is known to the company and can be furnished without unreasonable effort or expense; and
  • The undertakings required for delayed or continuous offerings under Rule 415 (comprising most offerings on Form S-3) require disclosure of any facts or events that, individually or in the aggregate, represent a fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement.

As a result, companies should consult with counsel to determine whether updates are needed prior to commencing a shelf takedown off an existing Form S-3.

Q:        If the COVID-19 Order has been relied upon to delay the filing of a Form 10-K, does it delay the date on which eligibility to use Form S-3 is tested?

A:        Yes, the filing date of the Form 10-K — even if that date is extended pursuant to the COVID-19 Order — is the date on which Form S-3 eligibility is retested.  The Form 10-K will be considered timely if all conditions of the COVID-19 Order are met with respect to the filing.

Q:        What if a company has taken advantage of the COVID-19 Order and files a new Form S‑3 between the original due date of a filing and the extended due date?

A:        The Staff will consider the company current and timely in its Exchange Act reports if the COVID-19 Order has been fully complied with, but the company must file the report by the extended due date.  The Staff is unlikely to declare the registration statement effective before the required filing is made, absent compelling and well-documented circumstances.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    IPO, Then What?
  • Organization:
    Foley Hoag LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo