Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Replacing Rogers Test with “Genuine Artistic Motive” Test Doesn’t Change the Finale in Dispute Over WILD AMERICA

By Jessica L. Hannah on May 20, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last year, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado denied defendant National Geographic’s motion to dismiss claims that the titles of National Geographic’s nature docuseries infringed the title of the plaintiff’s nature docuseries. Stouffer v. Nat’l Geographic Partners, 400 F. Supp. 3d 1161 (D. Colo. 2019). Rather than applying the Second Circuit’s Rogers test to determine Lanham Act liability for a creative work, the court had announced a new, multifactor test (the “genuine artistic motive” test) and granted the parties leave to address its new test. National Geographic again moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s Lanham Act claims. Applying the genuine artistic motive test for the first time, the court granted National Geographic’s motion to dismiss, concluding that the First Amendment protected National Geographic’s docuseries titles.

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Incontestable Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo