Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Tariff War Continues – Digital Services Tax Moves Into the Crosshairs of Section 301

By Ludmilla Kasulke, Jeff VanderWolk & Squire Patton Boggs on June 3, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

currency symbols euro dolar pound yencurrency symbols euro dolar poundThe Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) is requesting comments for newly initiated Section 301 investigations on digital services tax (DST) adopted or under consideration by Austria, Brazil, the Czech Republic, the European Union, India, Indonesia, Italy, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Comments are due by July 15. 

On June 2, USTR announced the initiation of the new investigations, and it is requesting comments to inform their investigations into the various DSTs, and their impacts on US-based technology companies.  Stakeholders impacted by the DSTs should submit comments to help guide the USTR investigation, but companies engaged in bilateral goods trade must also prepare for potential retaliatory tariffs to follow.

Over 135 countries and jurisdictions are engaged in multilateral talks aimed at securing an agreement on tax policies regarding online sales by multinationals, an issue of particular import to tech and media companies that are more deeply affected.  DSTs are of increasing interest to governments under pressure to raise revenue to support COVID-19 economic relief measures.  The United States is particularly opposed to these tax actions, arguing they are discriminatorily designed to apply mainly to major US tech companies.

As a first step, USTR will conduct an investigation into whether these DSTS are actionable under Section 301 (i.e., whether they “are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce. An act, policy, or practice is unreasonable if the act, policy, or practice, while not necessarily in violation of, or inconsistent with, the international legal rights of the United States, is otherwise unfair and inequitable.”).  If USTR decides to proceed, it will likely hold a second comment period regarding potential goods that could be subject to tariffs from these jurisdictions, or other actions the United States may take in response.

Please contact us with any questions.

Photo of Ludmilla Kasulke Ludmilla Kasulke
Read more about Ludmilla KasulkeEmail
  • Posted in:
    Antitrust, Competition and Trade
  • Blog:
    Capital Thinking
  • Organization:
    Squire Patton Boggs
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo