Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Chicken Industry Executives Indicted for Criminal Price-Fixing and Bid Rigging

By Luis M. Reyes, Lori Lustrin & Scott N. Wagner on June 5, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On June 3, 2020, the Department of Justice (DOJ) indicted executives from Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Claxton Poultry Farms—two of the country’s largest chicken producers.  The criminal action was filed in the District of Colorado, where Pilgrim’s Pride is headquartered.  The individuals criminally charged are Pilgrim’s President and CEO, Jayson Penn and former Vice President, Roger Austin, as well as Claxton’s President, Mikell Fries, and Vice President, Scott Brady.

The targeted victims of Defendants’ criminal scheme include national restaurant and grocery chains that negotiate directly with Defendants, their companies, and other co-conspirators for the purchase of chicken products on a yearly, quarterly, or monthly basis.

For the past several years, Pilgrim’s and Claxton and nearly twenty other chicken suppliers have been defending multiple civil class action and opt-out suits in the Northern District of Illinois before Judge Durkin.  Plaintiffs in the civil actions include food distributors, grocery stores, and restaurants.  Scrutiny of the poultry industry grew to new levels in June of 2019, however, when the Department of Justice sought a stay of the civil actions to allow for its criminal investigation.  The announcement of a Department of Justice investigation subsequent to the initiation of a related civil antitrust case is a rare occurrence in antitrust litigation.

The fruits of that investigation have now been set forth in the DOJ indictment.  The criminal action alleges that from at least 2012 through at least 2017, Pilgrim’s, Claxton, and at least five other unnamed chicken suppliers participated in a conspiracy to exchange confidential pricing information provided to some of their largest customers.

According to the indictment, the purpose and effect of the conspiracy was to “suppress and eliminate competition through rigging bids and fixing prices and price-related terms.”  Among the series of damning communications set forth in the indictment are text messages, such as “[defendant] said to raise our prices,” to which another defendant responded, “Tell him we are trying!”  The criminal defendants each face significant prison terms and up to $1M in fines.

The Bilzin team will continue to monitor activity in the criminal action and provide insights on what it means for victims of the price-fixing and bid-rigging scheme.

Photo of Lori Lustrin Lori Lustrin
Read more about Lori LustrinEmailLori's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Scott N. Wagner Scott N. Wagner
Read more about Scott N. WagnerEmail
  • Posted in:
    Criminal
  • Blog:
    The Food Court
  • Organization:
    Bilzin Sumberg
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo