Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

PTAB Sets Forth Procedure for Confidential Oral Hearings

By Amol Parikh on June 24, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated as informative a decision explaining the procedure for holding oral arguments where confidential information will be discussed. Curt G. Joa, Inc. v. Fameccanica.Data S.P.A., Case No. 2016IPR-00906 (PTAB June 20, 2017) (Chagnon, APJ).

Joa filed a petition for inter partes review against a patent owned by Fameccanica. Prior to oral argument, Fameccanica filed a motion indicating that it intended to discuss confidential information during the hearing and requesting that the PTAB close a portion of the hearing to the public.

The PTAB granted Fameccanica’s motion subject to certain conditions. The PTAB stated that each side would be allocated no more than 15 minutes of argument relating to confidential information in a session closed to the public. The parties would proceed with their presentations during the closed session in the same order as their presentations in the open session. The PTAB noted that if a party wanted allocate more time to the open portion of the hearing, it could do so by informing the PTAB at the beginning of the hearing, but under no circumstances would the party be allocated more than 15 minutes during the closed session. The PTAB also directed to the parties to refrain from including any confidential information in any demonstrative exhibit. Instead, during the portion of the hearing closed to the public, the parties could direct the panel to specific confidential information being discussed by exhibit, page and line number in the record.

Photo of Amol Parikh Amol Parikh

Amol Parikh concentrates his practice on intellectual property litigation, counseling and procurement. He draws on his trial and litigation experience in combination with his engineering training to quickly identify intellectual property issues and develop creative strategies to address them. Amol’s work on behalf…

Amol Parikh concentrates his practice on intellectual property litigation, counseling and procurement. He draws on his trial and litigation experience in combination with his engineering training to quickly identify intellectual property issues and develop creative strategies to address them. Amol’s work on behalf of clients has earned him recognition in many industry publications. Most recently, Amol was recognized in February 2019 with the International Law Office’s “2019 Client Choice Award” for Intellectual Property in Illinois. The award recognizes “excellent client care” and the “ability to add real value to clients’ business above and beyond the other players in the market,” and winners may only be nominated by corporate counsel. Read Amol Parikh’s full bio.

Read more about Amol ParikhEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    IP Update
  • Organization:
    McDermott Will & Emery
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo