Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Precedential Opinion Panel Exercises Restraint in Deciding Not to Review New Grounds of Unpatentability

By Publisher on July 14, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On July 6, 2020, the Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) held that the Board may raise a new ground of unpatentability against substitute claims in a motion amend, even when a petitioner does not advance or insufficiently develop that ground—but that it should only do so in rare circumstances.  In doing so, the POP granted Patent Owner DynaEnergetics GmbH’s request for rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d) and granted its Motion to Amend under 35 U.S.C. § 316(d)(1).

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    AIA Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo