Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Online Marketplaces May Be Required to Verify and Disclose Seller Information

By Corey Lee & Natalia San Juan on July 31, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Retail_online-shopping-key-on-keyboard

On July 23, 2020, U.S. Congresswoman Jan Schakowsky introduced H.R.7756 to require online marketplaces to verify and disclose to consumers certain information regarding high-volume third-party sellers of consumer products. The goal of the bill is to combat the sale of stolen, counterfeit, and dangerous consumer products by requiring transparency of third-party sellers on online retail marketplaces.

This follows a similar bill introduced by U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy and Dick Durbin on March 10, 2020, titled the Integrity, Notification, and Fairness in Online Retail Marketplaces for Consumers Act, or the INFORM Consumers Act. The INFORM Consumers Act directs online retail marketplaces that include third-party sellers of consumer products to verify the identity of high-volume third-party sellers on the platform. The bill defines “high-volume third-party sellers” as those who have entered into 200 or more discrete transactions in a 12-month period amounting to an aggregate total of $5,000 or more. To confirm the identity of these third-party sellers, the bill requires online marketplaces to acquire sellers’ government-issued photo identification, tax identification number, bank account information, and contact information on an annual basis.

The INFORM Consumers act would also require online retail marketplaces to disclose to consumers the seller’s name, business address, phone number, email address, and whether the seller engages in the manufacturing, importing, retail, or reselling of consumer products. The bill presents an exception, however, for individual high-volume third-party sellers that allows them not to disclose their personal street address or personal phone number as long as the sellers respond to consumer inquiries submitted via email within a reasonable time. Furthermore, the online marketplaces would have to provide contact information for customers to report suspicious activity.

It is also important to note that the act would hold online retail marketplaces accountable for the products on their platform sold by third-party sellers, with the intent of preventing the sale of counterfeit or stolen products to unsuspecting customers.

The Federal Trade Commission would implement the bill’s requirements, with violations resulting in civil penalties.

By establishing a baseline level of transparency for online retail marketplaces, the bill provides information so that consumers can distinguish between genuine retailers and frauds. However, this new consumer protection may place a great burden on online retail marketplaces that do not currently meet each of the legislation’s requirements, given the potential costs associated with altering procedures and adopting measures necessary to ensure compliance.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    Hunton Retail Law Resource
  • Organization:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo