In an ideal world, a contractor performs a portion of the work on a project as provided for in a construction contract, the owner pays the contractor an installment payment for that portion of the work, and the parties continue similarly until the work is finished. However, many factors can upset the equation – changes to or an expansion of the scope of work of the project or execution of an additional contract for scope of work different than the original. With increasing complexity of a project comes increasing opportunities for confusion or disputes over the allocation of payments for the parts of a project. In an article for the Daily Journal of Commerce, I provide general guidance as to how parties can amicably resolve any issues that may arise. Read the article here.

Originally published as “OP-ED: Allocate payments clearly to minimize construction disputes,” by the Daily Journal of Commerce, July 16, 2020.

Photo of Nicholas Karkazis Nicholas Karkazis

Nicholas Karkazis is an associate in Stoel Rives’ Litigation group. He is a complex civil litigation attorney with experience in construction, business, energy, real estate, general liability, and employment litigation. He has practiced in state and federal courts and in arbitration proceedings, and…

Nicholas Karkazis is an associate in Stoel Rives’ Litigation group. He is a complex civil litigation attorney with experience in construction, business, energy, real estate, general liability, and employment litigation. He has practiced in state and federal courts and in arbitration proceedings, and he has dealt with a wide range of issues including: breaches of contract, breaches of fiduciary duties, fraud, negligence, business disputes, products liability, wrongful termination, and contractual and equitable indemnity. In addition to his litigation experience, Nicholas has advised clients on contract drafting and negotiation.

Click here for Nicholas Karkazis’ full bio.