Skip to main content

Mike McBride Online

Over-Simplistic Scientific Intelligence

By Mike McBride

And this really brings me back to my point, that we do a poor job of truly understanding science, statistics and cause and effect. We believe that algorithms have all been well-thought out, and produce a “true” result, even when they are trying to predict something as unpredictable as what traffic will look like 20 years from now. We assume social science studies are giving us the “right” answer for how to educate people, or train them for the best outcomes, without considering what we are teaching them about the larger world. We assume that we can tweak one belief, or one thing, without human beings reacting to those changes in unpredictable ways, all the while thinking our one change will cause the reaction we DO predict.

We assume a lot that should never be assumed. We over-simplify a world that actually has more influences than we can possibly account for, and assume that what is really a small statistical difference represents a universal truth.

It doesn’t. There are no simple answers. It takes hard work, hard discussions, and lots of listening to figure out the best way forward. Don’t wait for AI to tell you what to do, it may be missing quite a bit.

The post Over-Simplistic Scientific Intelligence appeared first on Mike McBride Online. If you want to see more like this, consider subscribing to the RSS Feed.

Originally published at mikemcbrideonline.com

Citation

Mike McBride, Over-Simplistic Scientific Intelligence, Mike McBride Online (August 29, 2020) [The Library at LexBlog, LEX-WK-XQHQEJPF, lexpid.org/XQHQEJPF]

View the record

Filed under