Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

ONC Issues Interim Final Rule Extending Compliance Dates for the Information Blocking and the ONC Health IT Certification Program

By Jodi G. Daniel & Amber Mulcare on November 9, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Last week, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC)  published an Interim Final Rule: Information Blocking and the ONC Health IT Certification Program: Extension of Compliance Dates and Timeframes in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (Interim Final Rule) providing needed relief to entities working toward compliance.  In the 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, Information Blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program Final Rule (ONC Rule), issued on May 1, 2020, ONC defines the entities that are subject to the rule’s provisions. ONC refers to these entities as Actors. Actors include health care providers, health IT developers of certified health IT, Health Information Exchanges (HIEs), and Health Information Networks (HINs). The Interim Final Rule provides these Actors with “additional flexibilities” to implement the provisions of the ONC Rule including updated compliance dates.  ONC explained that the extension is due to the outbreak of COVID-19 public health emergency; however, this will also provide ONC with additional time to provide answers to the numerous questions that the agency has received as Actors work toward compliance. ONC is accepting comments on this rule, as is typical for an interim final rule. These comments must be submitted to regulations.gov by January 4, 2021.

The Interim Final Rule extends “the applicability date for the information blocking provisions and compliance dates and timeframes for certain Program requirements, including compliance dates for certain 2015 Edition health IT certification criteria and Conditions and Maintenance of Certification requirements.” See CMS and ONC Enforcement Deadlines Chart for more information about compliance dates for the ONC Rule.

Information Blocking

The Interim Final Rule extends the compliance date for the Information Blocking provisions of the ONC Rule. Actors subject to the Information Blocking provisions now have until April 5, 2021, to comply with these provisions.

The Interim Final Rule specifically calls out the ONC Rule’s “Content and Manner Exception.” In the ONC Rule, Actors would be prohibited from engaging in Information Blocking of Electronic Health Information (EHI). The Exception narrowed the scope of the EHI definition, however, to only include elements in the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) for the first 18 months after the compliance date. After that date, Actors would be required to exchange the full scope of date within the EHI definition. In the Interim Final Rule, ONC extended the date for compliance with the full definition of EHI to October 6, 2022.

Conditions of Certification

The extensions for the various Conditions of Certification (CoC) differ from April 5, 2021 to December 31, 2023. As a result, developers of certified health IT should refer to the compliance table linked above to determine the required compliance date for CoCs that apply to their business

Other Changes

The Interim Final Rule makes several technical changes. These changes include the adoption and incorporation by reference of the USCDI v1 (July 2020 Errata)[1], the adoption of the latest version of the US Core Implementation Guide 3.1.1 to support standardization across the healthcare IT industry.

The Interim Final Rule also identifies many technical corrections and other errors that ONC identified in the ONC Rule. The Interim Final Rule corrects these errors and provides additional clarification in the preamble for stakeholders to consider as they implement the ONC Rule provisions. Notably, ONC states that it was their “explicit intent that the definition of information blocking would only apply to developers of certified health IT, not all health IT developers” and corrected the regulatory text to include the full phrase “health IT developer of certified health IT.”

Enforcement

While Actors should comply with the provisions in the ONC Rule by the new, extended dates, Office of Inspector General (OIG) has stated that it will not begin enforcement of the information blocking provisions until the it finalizes its rules related to penalties. This likely will be before compliance is required, but could lead to additional delays. In addition, HHS must also publish regulation that establishes the “disincentives” for health care providers subject to the information blocking provisions before providers will be subject to government enforcement. Stakeholders will have the opportunity to comment on the health care provider disincentive rule.

What it All Means

While ONC and OIG remain committed to the improvement of interoperability, we believe that the delay was, in part, a response to the challenges that actors have had with compliance and the desire for ONC to provide guidance on numerous questions that actors have had about the applicability of the ONC Rule. ONC has begun to post guidance and we anticipate it will publish more over the coming weeks and months. In the meantime, the compliance extension provides some needed relief for actors that have worked hard to comply and need more time and for those that have been delayed in focusing on compliance efforts.

For more information, please contact Jodi Daniel (jdaniel@crowell.com).

[1] https://www.healthit.gov/​isa/​sites/​isa/​files/​2020-07/​USCDI-Version-1-July-2020-Errata-Final.pdf.

Photo of Jodi G. Daniel Jodi G. Daniel

Jodi Daniel is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Health Care Group and a member of the group’s Steering Committee. She is also a director at C&M International (CMI), an international policy and regulatory affairs consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring. She…

Jodi Daniel is a partner in Crowell & Moring’s Health Care Group and a member of the group’s Steering Committee. She is also a director at C&M International (CMI), an international policy and regulatory affairs consulting firm affiliated with Crowell & Moring. She leads the firm’s Digital Health Practice and provides strategic, legal, and policy advice to all types of health care and technology clients navigating the dynamic regulatory environment related to technology in the health care sector to help them achieve their business goals. Jodi is a contributor to the Uniform Law Commission Telehealth Committee, which drafts and proposes uniform state laws related to telehealth services, including the definition of telehealth, formation of the doctor-patient relationship via telehealth, creation of a registry for out-of-state physicians, insurance coverage and payment parity, and administrative barriers to entity formation.

Read more about Jodi G. DanielEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Amber Mulcare Amber Mulcare

Amber Mulcare (CIPP-US) is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity groups. She represents health insurance plans, health systems, major technology companies, government contractors, and other clients on a…

Amber Mulcare (CIPP-US) is an associate in Crowell & Moring’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the firm’s Health Care and Privacy & Cybersecurity groups. She represents health insurance plans, health systems, major technology companies, government contractors, and other clients on a variety of digital health, privacy, and security matters.

Read more about Amber MulcareEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Health Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Stridon News and Insights
  • Taft Class Action & Consumer Insights
  • Labor and Employment Law Insights
  • Age of Disruption
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo