Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

Newly-Certified Class Represents Latest Challenge to USCIS’s Blanket Repudiation of Occupation As H-1B Specialty

By Elizabeth (Liz) Espín Stern on November 19, 2020
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
US Supreme Court Building in Washington DC
The US Supreme Court Building columns with the words Equal Justice Under Law on the building.

A California federal court granted class certification to businesses accusing the US government of unlawfully rejecting market research analysts’ H-1B visa petitions, certifying a nationwide class of employers who say US Citizenship and Immigration Services systematically misreads the US Department of Labor’s definition of a market research analyst to mean that the position doesn’t qualify as a specialty occupation. Due to the pendency of a newly announced USCIS  interim final rule narrowing the definition of a “specialty occupation” when evaluating H-1B visa applications to those with narrowed degree requirements, U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen limited to companies that file visa petitions between January 1, 2019, and December 6, 2020, as the rule is slated to take effect December 7, 2020.  If the interim final rule, which is the subject of several lawsuits, is enjoined, plaintiffs have indicated they intend to request expansion of the class to encompass petitions filed as of December 7.

The class action represents the latest challenge to attempts by USCIS to narrow the definition of specialty occupation to exclude blanket occupations, where, as in the case of market research analysts, the government indicates that a degree in a narrow subspecialty is not “normally” required by employers.  As summarized in the order granting class certification: “Plaintiffs are only challenging the first test, which currently states that a position will qualify as a specialty occupation if “[a] baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position.” Dkt. 40 at 10; 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(1). Plaintiffs allege that USCIS routinely relies on the OOH, which includes a profile of the market research analyst occupation and states that market research analysts typically need a bachelor’s degree in market research or a related field and courses in statistics, research methods, and marketing. Dkt. 40 at 10–12. Further, Plaintiffs allege that USCIS erroneously concludes that the OOH does not establish that the occupation requires a bachelor’s degree or higher in a specific specialty or its equivalent and “fails to give meaning to the term ‘normally’ in the first regulatory test.” Id. at 10–11. Plaintiffs allege that had USCIS properly interpreted and applied the statute, the regulations, and the OOH profile, it would have found that the market research analyst occupation is a specific occupation and would have approved Plaintiffs’ and putative class members’ H-1B petitions. Id. at 12.”

As the courts review these cases, the new administration will be evaluating the agency posture on how restrictive – or not – the H-1B classification should be.  The H-1B visa is the only category available for recruiting from the open market, including campus recruiting or lateral talent acquisition.  Comments from credible enterprises in the business community are essential to shift the new administration’s perception of how selective but critical major company hiring of foreign students and highly skilled professionals, and to assure the new teams at the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor that companies are selective and competitive when sponsoring H-1B workers.

Photo of Elizabeth (Liz) Espín Stern Elizabeth (Liz) Espín Stern

Elizabeth Espín Stern, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office, leads the firm’s Global Mobility & Migration practice, which forms part of the Employment & Benefits group. She is a seasoned veteran, advising on US and global immigration, HR and mobility services.

Elizabeth Espín Stern, a partner in Mayer Brown’s Washington DC office, leads the firm’s Global Mobility & Migration practice, which forms part of the Employment & Benefits group. She is a seasoned veteran, advising on US and global immigration, HR and mobility services. She is consistently ranked as a leading business immigration lawyer by Chambers Global, Chambers USA, Who’s Who Legal, The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers, and national and local publications. In addition, she has been named in Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers and “Women in Law Awards 2014” by Lawyer Monthly and named one of National Law Journal’s “Outstanding Women Lawyers 2015.” She spearheads Mayer Brown’s new global worksite management initiative. This “Global People Solution” offers multinational clients, in a variety of sectors including financial services, IT, defense, telecommunications and multimedia, a comprehensive compliance and risk management program in connection with their mobile workforce. Liz regularly speaks and writes about immigration policies and contributes to major news agencies and publications, including Law 360, Quartz.com, Global Business News and a host of global HR publications.

Read full bio

Read more about Elizabeth (Liz) Espín SternEmailElizabeth's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Immigration
  • Blog:
    The Mobile Workforce
  • Organization:
    Mayer Brown
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo