Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Strike Two-and-a-Half: California Court of Appeal Holds Voter-Initiated Local Special Taxes Not Subject to Constitutional Two-Thirds Supermajority Voting Requirement (Again)

By Timothy Gustafson, Nikki Dobay & Eversheds Sutherland SALT on January 28, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On January 27, 2021, a California Court of Appeal in the state’s First Appellate District affirmed a San Francisco trial court decision which held the California Constitution’s requirement that local taxes be approved by a supermajority vote does not apply to taxes imposed by voter initiative. This is the second decision out of the First District to address the issue, with the Court reaching a similar conclusion last June. It also follows on the heels of a decision out of the Fifth Appellate District from December, wherein that Court likewise ruled the state Constitution’s supermajority requirement did not apply voter-initiated local special taxes. For background on these and related cases, see our prior coverage here and here.

The Court concluded that the First District’s June 30, 2020 opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons Interested in the Matter of Proposition C governed the outcome of the case, finding that decision to be “well-reasoned and sound.” The Court rejected attempts to distinguish the case from the prior opinion, including arguments related to the involvement of elective officials in the initiative process. Regarding the latter, the Court concluded that neither of the Propositions that added the constitutional provisions at issue “intended to constrain the initiative power when an official is involved in the initiative process.”

This is the third published appellate court decision (two from the same Appellate District) validating local special tax passed by only a simple majority.  Thus far, the California Supreme Court has shown no interest in granting review of these decisions. All eyes now turn to a case out of Oakland, where a trial court ruled the two-thirds vote requirement applies to voter-initiated local special taxes. That case is currently pending on appeal before a separate Division of the First Appellate District.  Is the proverbial strike three on its way? We’ll wait and see. And if it arrives, we’ll turn our attention to the California localities to see just how they respond. 

Photo of Timothy Gustafson Timothy Gustafson
Read more about Timothy GustafsonEmail
Photo of Nikki Dobay Nikki Dobay
Read more about Nikki DobayEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo