Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Another One: Proposed Montana Bill Would Tax Digital Advertising Services

By Nikki Dobay & Eversheds Sutherland SALT on February 9, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

A digital advertising tax proposal (LC 3237) has been drafted in Montana at the request of a Republican legislator. The bill, currently in draft form, would impose a new 10 percent tax on the annual gross revenues derived from digital advertising services in Montana on each person with worldwide annual gross revenue from digital advertising services of $25 million or more beginning January 1, 2022.

The bill defines a “digital advertising service” broadly as “an advertisement service on a digital interface, including advertisements in the form of banner advertising, search engine advertising, interstitial advertising, and other comparable advertising services.” A “digital interface” would include “any type of software, including a website, part of a website, or application, that a user is able to access.”

Similar to Maryland’s digital advertising tax proposal, Montana’s proposal would use an undeveloped apportionment fraction to apportion the tax to Montana – the numerator of which is the annual gross revenue derived from digital advertising services in the state and the denominator of which is the annual gross revenue derived from digital advertising services in the United States.  The bill would permit the Montana Department of Revenue to adopt administrative rules to implement the tax, including how to source digital advertising service revenues to the state.

LC 3237 was drafted at the request of Republican Representative Jeremy Trebas.  The draft bill was delivered to Rep. Trebas on February 8 and must be introduced within two legislative days. Montana will now join several other states considering a tax on digital advertising including, Connecticut, Maryland, and New York.

If the bill is enacted, legal challenges will follow. The tax likely violates federal and constitutional law, including the Permanent Internet Tax Freedom Act and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. The Eversheds Sutherland SALT team will continue to follow this proposal and provide updates.

Photo of Nikki Dobay Nikki Dobay
Read more about Nikki DobayEmail
  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo