Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

A Different Kind of “Mask Mandate”: Civil Rights Law Does Not Protect Employees Disciplined for Wearing “Black Lives Matter” Masks at Work

By Amanda Nugent & Giovanna Tiberii Weller on February 18, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Earlier this month, a Massachusetts federal court dismissed discrimination and retaliation claims against Whole Foods Market and its parent company Amazon alleging that Whole Foods workers faced discipline and retaliation, including docked pay, cut hours, and even termination, for wearing face masks and other paraphernalia bearing the slogan “Black Lives Matter” at work.  Whole Foods responded that the “Black Lives Matter” masks violated the Whole Foods employee dress code, but workers claimed that those violating the dress code to show support for the National Rifle Association or social causes like LGBTQ+ rights did not face similar discipline.

While recognizing that it would have been “more honorable” for Whole Foods and Amazon to “enforce their policies consistently and without regard for the messaging, particularly where the messaging selected for discipline conveys a basic truth,” the court nonetheless held that the workers’ claims should be dismissed because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “does not protect one’s right to associate with a given social cause, even a race-related one, in the workplace.”

Instead, the Court explained that the workplace civil rights law prohibits discrimination based upon an employee’s protected characteristic. The Whole Foods workers’ claims fell short because “no plaintiff alleges that he or she was discriminated against on account of his or her race or that he or she was discriminated against for advocating on behalf of a co-worker who had been subject to discrimination.”

The Massachusetts court ultimately described the workers’ claims as a First Amendment free speech case framed as civil rights case because Massachusetts does not extend First Amendment protections to the private workplace. This may not be the case in Connecticut.  Connecticut General Statute 31-51q prohibits any employer, public or private, from discharging or disciplining an employee on account of the exercise by the employee of rights guaranteed by the First Amendment and by similar provisions of the state constitution.  Accordingly, while employees may not have a federal right to associate with a particular social cause at work, employers in Connecticut must carefully consider whether any anticipated discipline based on the expression of political or social activism in the workplace may run afoul of Connecticut’s enhanced workplace speech protections.

If you have any questions about employee speech or social activism in the workplace, please contact a member of Carmody’s Labor & Employment Team.

Photo of Amanda Nugent Amanda Nugent
Read more about Amanda NugentEmail
Photo of Giovanna Tiberii Weller Giovanna Tiberii Weller

Giovanna Tiberii Weller is co-chair of the Labor and Employment practice. She has successfully defended many significant employment cases in federal and state courts, including discrimination, trade secret and non-competition claims, whistleblower, as well as numerous cases before the Connecticut Commission on Human…

Giovanna Tiberii Weller is co-chair of the Labor and Employment practice. She has successfully defended many significant employment cases in federal and state courts, including discrimination, trade secret and non-competition claims, whistleblower, as well as numerous cases before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities and the federal Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. She has successfully argued appeals before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the Connecticut Supreme Court and the Connecticut Appellate Court. Her clients include large and small employers, manufacturers, schools, utilities, and insurers. Giovanna regularly trains management personnel on a wide variety of employment related topics.

Read more about Giovanna Tiberii WellerEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Featured Posts
  • Blog:
    Carmody @ Work
  • Organization:
    Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo