Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Healthcare Providers Must Remain Vigilant with ADA Service Animal Requirements

By Melvin Muskovitz & David Padalino on February 18, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Health facilities and individual healthcare providers who open their offices to the public should remain aware they are subject to the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) requirements regarding service animals. Failing to adhere to the stringent ADA standards can quickly lead to patient complaints escalating to U.S. Department of Justice intervention, costly settlements, and steep civil penalties.

As a general rule, the ADA requires business that are open to the public to allow individuals with disabilities to bring their service animals onto business premises in whatever areas members of the public are allowed. The ADA takes care to note that this includes the professional office of health care providers. While service animals are limited to dogs that are individually trained to do work or perform tasks for a disabled person (i.e., guiding a visually-impaired person, providing stability for a person who has difficulty walking, preventing a child with autism from wandering away, alerting a person with a hearing deficiency to someone approaching), it is often overlooked that the ADA affords miniature horses the same protections as service animal, depending on the ability of a business to accommodate the animal. Animals whose sole function are to provide comfort or emotional support do not qualify as service animals under the ADA, but businesses should be sure to check any applicable state laws that may provide protections otherwise.

Businesses are limited in their ability to question an individual regarding the animal. The ADA enumerates the only two questions staff may ask: (1) is the service animal required because of a disability, and (2) what work or task has the service animal been trained to perform? Sticking to these questions, and going no further, is critical in maintaining ADA compliance.

The ADA also limits scenarios in which a business may remove a service animal from its premises: (1) if the service animal is out of control, (2) the service animal is not housebroken, or (3) the service animal poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others. With respect to when a service animal poses a threat to the health and safety of staff, patients, or other individuals, the ADA requires the business perform an individualized assessment of the specific facts at hand. This assessment must address the nature, duration, and severity of the threat, along with the probability that the potential injury will actually occur, and whether the business could make reasonable modifications to its policies, procedures, or practices to mitigate the risk.

What’s more, the ADA isn’t all bark and no bite. While customers and patients can file complaints and seek injunctive relief for alleged violations of the ADA, those complaints can lead to investigations by the U.S. Attorney’s Office and costly fines, even for first time offenders. Courts may assess civil penalties for ADA violations of up to $50,000 for a first violation and $100,000 for subsequent violations.

Businesses and providers should implement or review staff protocol and procedures for assessing exclusions or removals of service animals on an individualized basis, as well as its service animal policy notification to patients and visitors. These audits can help ensure compliance and prevent you from incurring ADA violations and harsh penalties.

To sign up for Dykema’s Health Care Blog email updates, please click here.  

Photo of Melvin Muskovitz Melvin Muskovitz

Mel represents public and private sector employers in federal and state courts, and before administrative agencies. He also devotes a significant portion of his time counseling and assisting employers with respect to issues arising under state and federal employment laws, assisting in drafting…

Mel represents public and private sector employers in federal and state courts, and before administrative agencies. He also devotes a significant portion of his time counseling and assisting employers with respect to issues arising under state and federal employment laws, assisting in drafting employment policies, preparing and enforcing confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition provisions, and negotiating employment and severance agreements, including with senior corporate executives.

Read more about Melvin MuskovitzEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of David Padalino David Padalino
Read more about David PadalinoEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care
  • Blog:
    Homeostasis: Dykema’s Health Care Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Dykema

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo