Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Growing Cannabis Industry Attracts Increased Government Enforcement

By Jonathan S. Feld, Lance Boldrey, Andrew T. VanEgmond & Dykema on April 12, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In the past few years, recreational marijuana legalization has increased, with New York becoming the most recent state to enact legislation. The growth has created substantial revenue opportunities for companies that have invested in preparing to participate in these new regulatory frameworks. Along with that nationwide expansion, though, comes greater government scrutiny. All current and future marijuana industry participants must stay aware of specific areas where the government is focusing its enforcement efforts and develop appropriate compliance procedures.

One area where law enforcement has shown interest is the process for obtaining state licenses. It was recently reported that Green Thumb Industries, a major marijuana company based in Chicago, is under federal investigation for potential “pay-to-play” violations to obtain its licenses. Although the exact conduct at issue is not yet clear, the investigation has looked at campaign donations Green Thumb made to politicians that led legalization efforts. Even before recreational marijuana was legalized in Michigan, there was already scrutiny on the medical marijuana license procurement process, including three defendants sent to prison for bribing city officials to obtain licenses. With the scarcity of licenses incentivizing companies to push the boundaries to obtain one, we expect federal authorities to keep the marijuana license procurement process on their radar.

The FDA has also shown recent interest in enforcing its advertising and drug application requirements against new CBD products. Just last month, it issued two warning letters to companies selling over-the-counter CBD products for pain relief. The FDA particularly took issue with how the companies’ marketing suggested their products were more effective because they contained CBD when the CBD was actually listed as an inactive ingredient. The FDA also targeted one of the companies for improperly implying its product had been approved by the FDA. Earlier in the COVID-19 pandemic, it even ordered a company to stop selling CBD products it claimed would help prevent contracting COVID-19. As the industry continues to experiment with new products, we anticipate that the FDA will carefully monitor how companies advertise their products’ medical benefits.

This increased enforcement scrutiny on the cannabis industry makes it now more important than ever for industry participants to ensure robust compliance policies are in place and monitor the effectiveness of those policies. Companies must properly account for all expenses, understand where the limits are on appropriate lobbying of government officials, and carefully scrutinize all potential marketing programs.

Photo of Jonathan S. Feld Jonathan S. Feld
Read more about Jonathan S. FeldEmail
Photo of Lance Boldrey Lance Boldrey

R. Lance Boldrey’s practice focuses on tribal and commercial gaming, and on Indian law (with an emphasis on economic development and state-tribal relations). He represents tribes, developers, banks and other non-tribal businesses, as well as state and local governments, and is a frequent…

R. Lance Boldrey’s practice focuses on tribal and commercial gaming, and on Indian law (with an emphasis on economic development and state-tribal relations). He represents tribes, developers, banks and other non-tribal businesses, as well as state and local governments, and is a frequent speaker on Indian law topics. Mr. Boldrey is also a leader of the Firm’s emerging Cannabis Law practice.

Read more about Lance BoldreyEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Andrew T. VanEgmond Andrew T. VanEgmond

Andrew VanEgmond is a litigation associate in Dykema’s Ann Arbor office. His practice focuses on automotive class actions, antitrust, products liability, employment litigation, evictions, health care matters, and other complex litigation. His research and drafting skills are central to his Dykema teams’ briefing…

Andrew VanEgmond is a litigation associate in Dykema’s Ann Arbor office. His practice focuses on automotive class actions, antitrust, products liability, employment litigation, evictions, health care matters, and other complex litigation. His research and drafting skills are central to his Dykema teams’ briefing and client advice.

Read more about Andrew T. VanEgmondEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Cannabis
  • Blog:
    Cannabis Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Dykema
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Beyond the First 100 Days
  • In the Legal Interest
  • Cooking with SALT
  • The Fiduciary Litigator
  • CCN Mexico Report™
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo