Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

EU Imposes Additional Sanctions against Two Military-Controlled Companies and 10 Individuals in Relation to the Military Coup in Myanmar

By Guy Soussan, Stefan Tsakanakis, Evan Abrams & Charlotte Brett on April 22, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On April 19, 2021, the EU Council added two companies controlled by the Tatmadaw (Myanmar Armed Forces) as well as 10 individuals to its Myanmar sanctions list (see Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/639 and Council Regulation 2021/638). The EU Council designated these entities and individuals by relying on the extended designation criteria established by Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/482 and Council Regulation 2021/479 on March 22, 2021, which provide for the possibility to impose restrictive measures against those involved in activities undermining democracy and the rule of law in Myanmar, as well as against the economic interests of the Tatmadaw. The EU Council had already adopted sanctions against eleven individuals on March 22, 2021 (see our previous client alert).

The new listings include:

  • Myanmar Economic Holdings Public Company Limited (MEHL) and Myanmar Economic Corporation Limited (MEC) as they are owned and controlled by the Tatmadaw and generate revenue for the Tatmadaw.
  • U Chit Naing, Minister for Information and Chairman of the State Administrative Council. He is deemed responsible for junta propaganda and spreading disinformation through state media, as well as for decisions that led to the crackdown on Myanmar media.
  • Nine members of the State Administrative Council, that are considered to undermine democracy and the rule of law, and responsible for serious human rights violations. These include Mahn Nyein Maung; Thein Nyunt; Khin Maung Swe; Jeng Phang Naw Htaung; Maung Ha; Sai Long Hseng; Saw Daniel; Dr Banyar Aung Moe; and Aye Nu Sein (also Vice-chair of the Arakan National Party).

Restrictive measures include travel bans and asset freezes. In addition, EU citizens and companies are forbidden from making funds available to the listed individuals and entities. These latest sanctions come in addition to pre-existing sanctions, which include an embargo on arms and equipment that can be used for internal repression, an export ban on dual-use goods for use by the military and border guard police, and export restrictions on equipment for monitoring communications that might be used for internal repression. Those measures also included the designation of 14 persons for atrocities against the Rohingya population. Combined with the latest designations, this brings the total to 35 individuals and two companies.

The EU sanctions adopted against MEHL and MEC in relation to the military coup is a significant step forward in preventing revenues from reaching the military. The two conglomerates are deemed to provide revenues to the Tatmadaw which in turn contributes to the military’s capabilities to carry out activities undermining democracy, the rule of law and violating human rights in Myanmar. These listings carry further importance as they have vast holdings in many industries, thereby occupying an important part in Myanmar’s economy with subsidiaries and affiliated companies in a range of sectors including banking, insurance, construction, trade, transportation, mining, gem extraction, manufacturing and tourism.

The EU Council’s decision to target MEHL and MEC comes as the United States and the United Kingdom have already imposed sanctions against both entities. The US designated MEHL and MEC on March 25, 2021 (discussed in our prior client alert). Since then the US has remained active with respect to Myanmar sanctions announcing the designation of a state-owned gem company on April 8, 2021 and of timber and pearl companies on April 21, 2021. On March 25, 2021, in coordination with the US, the UK designated MEHL. The UK also designated MEC on April 1, 2021. Both designations were made under The Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020.

As we previously highlighted, companies operating in Myanmar should pay particular attention since the prohibition on providing funds or economic resources to the listed persons extends to any legal entities that they own or control, directly or indirectly, regardless of whether such entity is listed or not. Moreover, the fact that the EU may designate those providing support or benefiting from the Tatmadaw adds some additional risk to conducting business in Myanmar.

Photo of Guy Soussan Guy Soussan

Guy Soussan advises clients on various aspects of EU and French export control regulations, including controls and licensing regimes for both military and commercial products and technologies. His export practice covers compliance development and implementation, internal investigations, and enforcement matters, including voluntary disclosures.

Guy Soussan advises clients on various aspects of EU and French export control regulations, including controls and licensing regimes for both military and commercial products and technologies. His export practice covers compliance development and implementation, internal investigations, and enforcement matters, including voluntary disclosures. He also provides advice and assistance with EU economic sanctions targeting specific countries such as Iran, Libya, Syria, and most recently, Ukraine and Russia. His experience covers a wide range of industries, including manufacturing, energy, telecommunications, banking and insurance, petroleum and petro-chemicals, aerospace, and defense. He has conducted internal compliance audits, provided assistance on company compliance programs, and counseled clients on the application of the rules to specific transactions.

Read Guy’s full bio.

Read more about Guy SoussanEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Evan Abrams Evan Abrams

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in…

Evan Abrams counsels multinational corporations, financial institutions, and individuals on various international regulatory and compliance matters. He assists foreign and domestic companies in navigating national security reviews by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). He has represented companies in industries including semiconductors, metals, and digital security. Evan’s anti-money laundering (AML) practice focuses on helping financial institutions comply with federal and state AML rules, particularly money transmitters and entities involved in creating, exchanging, or dealing in cryptocurrencies and tokens. Evan counsels clients in a variety of export controls and sanctions matters related to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), and various sanctions programs under US and international law. In addition, Evan routinely assists clients on anti-corruption investigations and enforcement actions.

Read Evan’s full bio.

Read more about Evan AbramsEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    International Compliance Blog
  • Organization:
    Steptoe LLP

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo