Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

FTC Files First Civil Penalty Complaint Alleging Deceptive COVID-19 Marketing

By Tiffany Aguiar & Lauren B. Aronson on April 27, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Consumer Protection. Laws, regulations and data security. Pencils, wooden stamps on orange paper

On April 15, 2021, the FTC filed its first complaint under the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act (the CCP Act). The complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, alleges that an in-state chiropractor and his company violated both the CCP Act and the FTC Act by deceptively marketing Vitamin D and Zinc products to treat COVID-19.

According to the complaint, St. Louis-based Eric A. Nepute and his company, Quickwork LLC, promote scientifically proven representations that the Wellness Warrior products containing Vitamin D and Zinc will provide equal or better protection against COVID-19 than currently available COVID-19 vaccines.  Additionally, Nepute’s videos claimed that “COVID-19 Patients who get enough Vitamin D are 52% less likely to die” and that people who consume enough Vitamin D3 “have a 77% less chance of getting infected in the first place.”

In May 2020, Nepute received a warning letter advising him to review the claims for his products and to cease making representations unsupported by reliable scientific evidence. According to the complaint, despite the warning letter, the defendants “ramped up their unsubstantiated claims regarding Vitamin D and Zinc.” The FTC is now seeking monetary penalties and a preliminary injunction that bars defendants from making health claims unless they are true and can be substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence.

The COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act 

Titled the “COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act” (see page 2094 here), the law lasts for the duration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d).

The Act makes it unlawful under Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act for any person, partnership, or corporation to engage in a deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce associated with the treatment, cure, prevention, mitigation, or diagnosis of COVID–19 or a government benefit related to COVID–19. The Act provides that such a violation shall be treated as a violation of a rule defining an unfair or deceptive act or practice prescribed under Sec. 18(a)(1)(B) of the FTC Act enabling the FTC to obtain civil penalties.

The FTC’s Efforts to Enforce the COVID-19 Consumer Protection Act 

The FTC has made it clear by sending hundreds of warning letters during the COVID-19 pandemic that it is closely monitoring deceptive COVID-19 acts and practices. Advertisers cannot make any express or implied claims that their products or services are effective against preventing or curing coronavirus absent competent and reliable scientific evidence. Now, the FTC is armed with the power to seek civil penalties and we should expect additional lawsuits under the CCP Act as  it continues to monitor the marketplace.

Photo of Tiffany Aguiar Tiffany Aguiar
Read more about Tiffany AguiarEmail
Photo of Lauren B. Aronson Lauren B. Aronson
Read more about Lauren B. AronsonEmail
  • Posted in:
    Administrative and Regulatory
  • Blog:
    Retail & Consumer Products Law Observer
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo