Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Rights in audiovisual works under Copyright Law

By Kriton Metaxopoulos of A. & K. Metaxopoulos and Partners Law Firm & Irini Daroussou of A. & K. Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm on April 28, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Authors’ rights

According to the Copyright Law, authors of audiovisual works have various rights, including:

  • producing fixations or reproductions of the work;
  • making the work available to the public (eg, by publishing it on an on-demand video service);
  • broadcasting the work on TV or the radio; and
  • communicating the work to the public.

These are absolute rights (ie, they require the author’s prior written authorisation).

Article 35(1) of the Copyright Law provides that no further licences are required for repeated TV or radio broadcasts unless otherwise agreed. However, the broadcasting organisation must pay the author:

  • for the first rebroadcast – at least 50% of the fee agreed for the first broadcast; and
  • for each subsequent rebroadcast – at least 20% of the fee agreed for the first broadcast.

This provision does not apply to relations between collective management organisations and users. Article 35(5) stipulates that only collective management organisations may administer the author’s cable retransmission right.

Artists’ and performers’ rights

Artists and performers of audiovisual works enjoy the following rights, among others.

Activity Right
Producing fixations or reproductions of the work This is an absolute right (ie, it requires the artist’s or performer’s written authorisation).
Making the work available to the public (eg, by publishing it on an on-demand video service) This is an absolute right (ie, it requires the artist’s or performer’s written authorisation).
Broadcasting a legal fixation of the work on TV or the radio The artist or performer has a right to equitable remuneration. Collective management organisations must administrate such broadcasts.
Communicating a legal fixation of the work to the public The artist or performer has a right to equitable remuneration. Collective management organisations must administrate such communications.
Broadcasting an illegal fixation of the work on TV or the radio This is an absolute right (ie, it requires the artist’s or performer’s written authorisation).

Producers’ rights

Producers of audiovisual works also have the following rights:

  • reproducing and making copies of the work;
  • making the work available to the public (eg, by publishing it on an on-demand video service);
  • broadcasting the work on TV or the radio, including satellite transmission or cable retransmission thereof; and
  • communicating the work to the public.

These are absolute rights (ie, they require the author’s prior written authorisation).

Article 34(1) of the Copyright Law provides as follows:

A contract dealing with the creation of an audiovisual work between a producer and an author shall specify the economic rights which are to be transferred to the producer. If the aforementioned provision is not met, the contract shall be deemed to transfer to the producer all the economic rights which are necessary for the exploitation of the audiovisual work, pursuant to the purpose of the contract. (1) (Emphasis added.)

Further, Article 46(3) of the Copyright Law stipulates as follows:

Subject to contractual clauses to the contrary, explicitly specifying which acts are authorized, the acts listed in paragraph (2), above, shall be presumed to have been authorized when a performer has entered into an employment contract, having as its object the operation of those particular acts, with a party who is doing such acts. (2)

These provisions, which align with the Civil Code’s freedom of contract principle, mean that all absolute rights may be licensed or transferred, under contract, to the producer, excluding the rights or powers which fall under the mandatory collective management administration scheme. Even when such powers are not specifically mentioned in the contract, the producer acquires all of the economic rights which are necessary for the exploitation of the audiovisual work. For example, in a contract which deals with the theatrical distribution of a work, the producer acquires all of the rights connected to the purpose of the contract.

For further information on this topic please contact Irini Daroussou or Kriton Metaxopoulos at A & K Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm by telephone (+30 210 725 7614) or email (idaroussou@metaxopouloslaw.gr ork.metaxopoulos@metaxopouloslaw.gr).  The A & K Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm website can be accessed at www.metaxopouloslaw.gr.

Endnotes

(1) Official Hellenic Copyright Organisation translation.

(2) Id.

This article was originally edited by, and first published on, www.internationallawoffice.com. Please click here to view the original publication.

Photo of Kriton Metaxopoulos of A. & K. Metaxopoulos and Partners Law Firm Kriton Metaxopoulos of A. & K. Metaxopoulos and Partners Law Firm

Kriton Metaxopoulos, born in 1962, is a graduate of the Athens University Law School (1984) as well as an LL.M graduate of the London School of Economics (1986). He has been practicing law since 1986 and he is the Managing Partner of “A.

Kriton Metaxopoulos, born in 1962, is a graduate of the Athens University Law School (1984) as well as an LL.M graduate of the London School of Economics (1986). He has been practicing law since 1986 and he is the Managing Partner of “A. & K. Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm” since 2000.

His peers recognize him for his experience and expertise in Intellectual Property Law, Patent Law, Corporate Law and Litigation. He is recognized as a leading lawyer in Litigation and Intellectual Property in Legal 500, a leading Individual in TMT and Dispute Resolution by Chambers and an Advisory Board Member in Best Lawyers.

He was a BoD member of Warner Music for almost 20 years and was a member of the Board of Directors of Trans European Law Firms Alliance (TELFA) for 25 years.

Kriton is an expert in IP Law, Copyright Enforcement and Antipiracy issues, as well as in international Corporate Litigation, White Collar Crime and Asset Recovery He has represented for years MPAA, the Greek Audiovisual Anti-Piracy Association (EPOE), Sony, Warner Bros, Disney, Warner Music, Dassault Systemes, Audiorsparx, as well as many major players of the Greek entertainment industry, such as Odeon Cinemas, Victory Media, Kiss FM, Hot FM, Greek Music Libraries, Maria Callas Estate, ZTE etc

Kriton’s “out of Greek borders career” is mainly linked to IP, White Collar Crime and Corporate Fraud prosecution. Kriton is responsible for the coordination and legal strategy of a 150 million Euro international corporate litigation matter, involving legal work in Italy, Lebanon, Romania, UK, France and former Soviet Union and Greece. His experience includes representation before Civil and Penal Courts not only in Greece but also in France, Italy, UK and Romania in cooperation with top tier law firms and local practitioners.

Kriton’s experience in International Arbitration includes representation of an International Catering Group in 20 million USD arbitration (ICC), which resulted in an award against the Greek State (19 million USD) over the privatization of Olympic Airways’ catering subsidiary in the ‘90s.

Connected his name with the first ever in Europe prohibition of legal parallel imports of DvDs (Independence Day) by a 1997 decision of the Athens Court of Injunctions, which was subsequently adopted in 2010 by two ECJ “ad hoc” decisions which are applied until today by local Courts in all EU Member States.

He is also known for his involvement in audiovisual censorship cases (Alexander the Great, Last Temptation of Christ) where he represented in Court the US producers and their Greek distributors, contributing to the free theatrical release of the relevant movies in Greece but also to the establishment of a solid case law in favour of the freedom of “viewing” even if “symbols” or “religions” are the “subject r matter” of the audiovisual work in question.

He is since 2000 leading the niche law firm “A. & K. Metaxopoulos and Partners Law Firm”.

Read more about Kriton Metaxopoulos of A. & K. Metaxopoulos and Partners Law FirmEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Irini Daroussou of A. & K. Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm Irini Daroussou of A. & K. Metaxopoulos & Partners Law Firm

Irini Daroussou was born in Athens and is a partner at “A&K Metaxopoulos Law Firm” since 2008, whereas she joined the law firm as an associate lawyer in 2002. She has been practicing law since 1998, when she was admitted to the Athens…

Irini Daroussou was born in Athens and is a partner at “A&K Metaxopoulos Law Firm” since 2008, whereas she joined the law firm as an associate lawyer in 2002. She has been practicing law since 1998, when she was admitted to the Athens Bar Association. She is a LL.M. Graduate in Intellectual Property Law, Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London. From the very beginning of her law practice, she focused on the protection of IP rights. She specializes in Copyright Law, Antipiracy, Industrial Law, Commercial and Civil Law, Unfair Competition and IP Litigation.

In 2014 Irini was listed in Best Lawyers in the field of Intellectual and Industrial Property Law. She has been also appraised as an expert in the field of IP, by Legal 500 and IAM Patent. Irini has represented a range of Greek and International clients in the copyright sector, including foreign and Greek film production companies, record labels, radio stations, publishing companies, software design product companies, the Greek collecting society for the protection of audiovisual works etc. She regularly advises entities in the audiovisual, music and publishing area and has a significant experience in drafting copyright and IP licensing agreements.

She has participated in many law conferences, in Greece and abroad. She is a frequent author and contributes to magazines and international publications. Some of her recent articles are: “IP in Greece: Landmark Decision Orders Greek ISPs to Block Internet Access” (CEE Legal Matters, February 2014), “Court Ruling Affects Authors’ Rights In The Media Sector” (Legal Knowledge Portal, October 2013), “Broadcast of Music By Radio To Clients Of Professional Practices On A Non Profit Basis Is Not Public And As A Result Is Royalty Free” (Legal Knowledge Portal, May 2012), “Legal Treatment Of Camcording Under Greek Intellectual Property Law And General Provisions of Civil Law” (Legal Knowledge Portal, May 2012). She speaks fluently English and French.

Read more about Irini Daroussou of A. & K. Metaxopoulos & Partners Law FirmEmailIrini's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    ILN IP Insider
  • Organization:
    International Lawyers Network
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo