Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

Los Angeles City Council’s Public Safety Committee Votes to Move Forward with Expanding Fire Rating Requirements for New Construction

By Reuben Duarte* & Elijah Griffen on June 11, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Real-Estate-LA-2-Blog-Image-660x283

On Wednesday, June 2, the Los Angeles City Council’s Public Safety Committee voted to proceed with expanding Fire District 1 after receiving a report produced by the Department of Building and Safety, Fire Department, and City Planning Department.  The report analyzed the potential impacts of the expansion of Fire District 1, which prohibits certain construction types in limited areas of the City of Los Angeles, such as Downtown and Hollywood.  The report concluded that the expansion of Fire District 1 would result in an increase in construction and materials cost and would likely reduce the financial feasibility of affordable housing projects and result in fewer projects throughout the City.

The report was prepared at the request of the  City Council, pursuant to the motion entitled Building a Safer Los Angeles (“Motion”).  The Motion, adopted on April 6, 2021, directs City staff to prepare an ordinance that expands the requirements for Fire District 1 to all areas:

  • With high population density of at least 5,000 or more residents per square mile; and
  • Subject to the California’s Very High Fire Severity Zone and the City’s High Wind Velocity Zone.

The Motion also called for: (1) mandating a Fire Protection Plan for all new and significantly altered projects over 150,000 square feet and/or 100,000 square feet if over 30 feet in height; and (2) recommendations to ensure skilled workers are employed for new multi-family and commercial structures within Fire District 1.

Due to these requirements, the ordinance proposed pursuant to the Motion, if adopted, would result in significant restrictions on the use of light wood-frame construction throughout large parts of the City.  While certain labor, concrete construction, and building safety advocates support such an ordinance, many businesses  and affordable housing groups oppose it, arguing it would increase housing construction costs and result in fewer affordable housing projects.

The proposed expansion of Fire District 1 will now proceed to the City Council’s Planning, Land Use and Management Committee for its review at a date yet to be determined.

*Elijah Griffen is a summer associate with Sheppard Mullin

Photo of Reuben Duarte* Reuben Duarte*

Reuben Duarte is a senior planner in the Real Estate, Land Use, and Environmental Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Email
Photo of Elijah Griffen Elijah Griffen

Elijah W. (“Eli”) Griffen is an associate in the Real Estate, Energy, Land Use & Environmental Practice Group in the firm’s Los Angeles office.

Read more about Elijah GriffenEmail
  • Posted in:
    Real Estate & Construction
  • Blog:
    Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog
  • Organization:
    Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo