Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherBrowse by ChannelAbout the NetworkJoin the NetworkProductsSub-MenuProducts OverviewBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAbout UsContactSubscribeSupport
Book a Demo
Search
Close

Army Corps Halts Coverage Under Nationwide Permits

By Anna Wildeman, Dave Ross, Chuck Sensiba, Brooks Smith, Andrea Wortzel & Byron Kirkpatrick on November 5, 2021
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Landowners and permit applicants received an email notification this week that the Army Corps of Engineers (Army Corps) would not be processing their requests for coverage under a variety of Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Nationwide Permits (NWPs). NWPs are general permits that authorize activities under Clean Water Act Section 404 that “will cause only minimal adverse environmental effects when performed separately, and will have only minimal cumulative adverse effects on the environment.” CWA Section 404 (e)(1).

The email from the Army Corps states,

We were informed today that due to the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on October 21, 2021 to remand USEPA’s 2020 CWA 401 rule with vacatur, the US Army Corps of Engineers is not finalizing any permit decisions that rely on a certification or waiver under the 2020 rule at this time. The Corps is working to provide more refined guidance that provides a way forward that allows us to finalize permit decisions. (Emphasis added)

This informal notification can be found on at least one Army Corps District website in the “Latest News” section, but as of this writing, the agency has not issued a formal notice or press release that it has halted coverage under its NWP program. The move affects these 16 NWPs that the Army Corps finalized in January 2021, all of which went through formal notice and comment rulemaking and were subject to the CWA Section 401 certification process before being issued:

12. Oil or Natural Gas Pipeline Activities
21. Surface Coal Mining Activities
29. Residential Developments
39. Commercial and Institutional Developments
40. Agricultural Activities
42. Recreational Facilities
43. Stormwater Management Facilities
44. Mining Activities
48. Commercial Shellfish Mariculture Activities
50. Underground Coal Mining Activities
51. Land-Based Renewable Energy Generation Facilities
52. Water-Based Renewable Energy Generation Pilot Projects
55. Seaweed Mariculture Activities
56. Finfish Mariculture Activities
57. Electric Utility Line and Telecommunications Activities
58. Utility Line Activities for Water and Other Substances

The Army Corps’ notification comes weeks after EPA announced on its website that the Northern District of California court decision “requires a temporary return to EPA’s 1971 rule until EPA finalizes a new certification rule.” To date, neither agency has explained why the N.D. of California decision would result in a nationwide vacatur of the 401 Rule, or why that court decision would affect NWPs that were properly promulgated based on the law that was in effect at the time. Indeed, no court has considered or concluded that these NWPs, or the Section 401 certifications issued for them, are unlawful.

The notification was also issued the very same day as the Senate voted 92-5 to confirm Michael Connor to serve as the assistant secretary of the Army for civil works. It is unclear if Mr. Connor ordered the halt in permitting, but his ability to make headway on the administration’s infrastructure, resilience, and climate goals will no doubt be hindered by the significant uncertainty left in its wake. As the list above indicates, until further notice, NWP coverage will not be granted for stormwater management projects; land- or water-based renewable energy projects; or electric, telecommunications or water utility line activities — not to mention residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, and recreational activities.

In the interim, landowners and project proponents do have the option of applying for an individual CWA Section 404 permit, but that process can take up to a year or more to complete, compared to the NWP process, which is intended to streamline the process for those activities with minimal environmental impact and can take as little as 60 days. For context, the Army Corps grants CWA Section 404 general permit coverage for more than 50,000 activities per year, but only issues an average of 2,500 individual CWA 404 permits per year.

The Army Corps’ notification leaves so many questions unanswered. How long will it take the agency to “provide more refined guidance”? Will the agency seek new programmatic Section 401 certifications for these NWPs before coverage can be granted? If so, will the agency re-promulgate the NWPs so they include new certification conditions, or will the agency attempt to add new conditions without going through the rulemaking process? Will the agency require every activity authorized under CWA Section 404 to receive an individual Section 401 certification until EPA promulgates a new certification rule?

We recognize that the Army Corps’ notification also has the potential to derail individual permit applications that already received certifications but for which a permit has not yet been issued. This is likely to create delays and potential problems for property owners and project proponents that have already gone through a potentially lengthy certification process. However, it presents a different suite of issues than halting coverage under already-issued NWPs.

Photo of Dave Ross Dave Ross
Email
Photo of Chuck Sensiba Chuck Sensiba
Read more about Chuck SensibaEmailChuck's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Brooks Smith Brooks Smith
Read more about Brooks SmithEmailBrooks's Linkedin Profile
Photo of Andrea Wortzel Andrea Wortzel

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply…

Andrea focuses her practice on water quantity and water quality issues, including water rights, water supply planning, and water withdrawal permitting, as well as discharge permitting and TMDL development and implementation. She coordinates a growing and influential stakeholder group focused on water supply issues in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Beyond her water practice, Andrea advises clients on endangered species issues, landfill permitting and compliance, waste permitting, environmental compliance and audit programs and environmental enforcement defense. Andrea also regularly counsels clients on legislative and regulatory strategies to promote her clients’ objectives.

Read more about Andrea WortzelEmailAndrea's Linkedin Profile
Show more Show less
Photo of Byron Kirkpatrick Byron Kirkpatrick
Read more about Byron KirkpatrickEmail
  • Posted in:
    Environmental
  • Blog:
    Environmental Law & Policy Monitor
  • Organization:
    Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • Resource Center
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center
  • Blogging 101

New to the Network

  • Tennessee Insurance Litigation Blog
  • Claims & Sustains
  • New Jersey Restraining Order Lawyers
  • New Jersey Gun Lawyers
  • Blog of Reason
Copyright © 2025, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo