Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
CommunitySub-MenuPublishersChannelsProductsSub-MenuBlog ProBlog PlusBlog PremierMicrositeSyndication PortalsAboutContactResourcesSubscribeSupport
Join
Search
Close

OSERS Guidance on Assistive Technology

By Koga Ndikum-Moffor & FranczekPC on January 3, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

In this third blog post in our series on the OSERS Question and Answer document on IDEA requirements related to returning to in-person instruction, we are focusing on an issue of special importance during and subsequent to the pandemic: assistive technology.

Even before schools shut their doors in the spring of 2020, many were already providing one-to-one devices for students. With the transition to virtual learning, even more schools provided students with laptops to enable them to participate in instruction from home. As more and more students are using technology in school, including software that provides supports like word prediction, speech-to-text, and text-to-speech, IEP team members may be unsure whether that technology should be recorded on the IEP as assistive technology for a student with a disability.

Assistive technology is defined under IDEA as “any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of a child with a disability.” In developing the IEP, the IEP team is charged with considering whether the student needs assistive technology to receive a free and appropriate public education (FAPE).

So to determine whether a laptop or other device belongs on a student’s IEP as assistive technology, OSERS advises that the IEP team consider whether it is a piece of equipment or product that is used to increase, maintain, or improve the functional capabilities of the student and whether it is needed for the student to receive meaningful educational benefit. If a student needs a laptop with text-to-speech capabilities in order to access the curriculum and progress toward ambitious and individualized goals, then that technology should be specified on the student’s IEP as assistive technology, even if all students have access to that same technology. On the other hand, if the technology is generally available but not needed to address a disability-related need, then it would not be included as assistive technology on the IEP.

OSERS also reminds IEP teams that a student may need assistive technology services in addition to the device or equipment itself. Assistive technology services assist a child with a disability in the selection, acquisition, or use of an assistive technology device.

While teams routinely provide assessments and trials of different devices to select those that meet the needs of a student, a common shortfall is not also providing training to the student, service providers, and family on how to effectively use the device and its features. The standard laptop that all students receive may include software that can enlarge print, spell check, and read text aloud, but if a student with a disability does not know how to use those functions as part of their daily classwork, the assistive technology will not serve the intended purpose. Teams can consider including assistive technology consultation or direct services on a student’s IEP to help the student learn to use their assistive technology and make it an effective learning tool.

The OSERS Q&A includes an overview of many IDEA topics, including the Department’s interpretations and suggestions, making it a helpful resource. Please reach out to our Special Education Team with questions about assistive technology and any other IDEA issues you encounter.

Photo of Koga Ndikum-Moffor Koga Ndikum-Moffor
EmailKoga's Linkedin Profile
  • Posted in:
    Education
  • Blog:
    Special Education Law Insights
  • Organization:
    Franczek P.C.
  • Article: View Original Source

LexBlog, Inc. logo
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
Real Lawyers
99 Park Row
  • About LexBlog
  • Careers
  • Press
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Editorial Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms of Service
  • RSS Terms of Service
  • Products
  • Blog Pro
  • Blog Plus
  • Blog Premier
  • Microsite
  • Syndication Portals
  • LexBlog Community
  • 1-800-913-0988
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
  • Resource Center

New to the Network

  • Pro Policyholder
  • The Way on FDA
  • Crypto Digest
  • Inside Cybersecurity & Privacy Law
  • La Oficina Legal Ayala Hernández
Copyright © 2022, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo