Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

OSHA’s “vaccine or test” mandate stayed (again)

By Vincent Farisello, Stephanie E. Cummings & Romania Morley on January 13, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

Earlier this afternoon, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a stay blocking the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (“OSHA”) from enforcing its “vaccine or test” mandate previously imposed on businesses with 100 or more employees.  This case will return to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for the underlying merits to be litigated.

The stay means that employers are not required to comply with the “vaccine or test” mandate at this time.  This could change, however, as the underlying merits are litigated.

The Supreme Court’s ruling does not impact an employer’s or a state’s ability to impose safety rules and regulations relating to COVID-19, including requiring employees be vaccinated (with sufficient religious and medical exemptions) or to be tested weekly.

The Supreme Court did rule, however, that similar requirements under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ (CMS) vaccine rule for certain healthcare employers with medical facilities that take Medicare or Medicaid payments were permitted.

Background on the ETS litigation.

On November 5, 2021, OSHA published an Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) mandating that employers with 100 or more employees either require employees be vaccinated or submit to weekly COVID-19 testing, among other things.  Shortly thereafter, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the ETS.

As lawsuits were filed in a multitude of states, the various cases were consolidated and heard by the Sixth Circuit, which was selected by lottery.  On December 17, 2021, the Sixth Circuit ruled that the Fifth Circuit’s stay was not justified and dissolved the stay. Following the dissolution, OSHA set new compliance dates for the ETS mandate (February 9, 2022 for vaccine or testing requirements and January 10, 2022 for all other components), while opponents of the Sixth Circuit’s decision appealed to the Supreme Court.

What happened at the Supreme Court?

On January 7, 2022, the Supreme Court heard arguments on whether or not a stay of the ETS mandate should be reinstated.  This afternoon, the Supreme Court found that the Sixth Circuit improperly dissolved the stay and overturned its decision.

As a result, OSHA is again blocked from enforcing its “vaccine or test” mandate pending resolution on the underlying legal issue – i.e., whether OSHA had the legal authority to impose such a mandate.

What happens now?

This fight isn’t over yet.  The argument on whether OSHA had the authority to implement the ETS still needs to be resolved.  This will likely happen at the Sixth Circuit or possibly at the Supreme Court.

This information is for educational purposes only to provide general information and a general understanding of the law. It does not constitute legal advice and does not establish any attorney-client relationship.

Photo of Vincent Farisello Vincent Farisello

Vincent Farisello maintains a versatile practice in the areas of both labor and employment and general corporate law. Vincent’s labor and employment practice focuses on counseling and advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. To do so, Vincent works with clients…

Vincent Farisello maintains a versatile practice in the areas of both labor and employment and general corporate law. Vincent’s labor and employment practice focuses on counseling and advising employers on all aspects of the employment relationship. To do so, Vincent works with clients to manage risks and formulate strategies to avoid litigation and to comply with regulatory obligations. Vincent regularly represents employers in mediations, arbitrations, labor negotiations, contract negotiations and defends employers before various state and federal administrative agencies. Vincent is also a frequent presenter of seminars and training sessions on a variety of common employment issues.

Read more about Vincent FariselloEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Stephanie E. Cummings Stephanie E. Cummings

Stephanie E. Cummings practices in a variety of areas, including labor and employment law, corporate law, personal injury, real estate, trusts and estates and general civil litigation. Her clients include small businesses and individuals with varying needs.

Read more about Stephanie E. CummingsEmail
Romania Morley

Romania Jawahir is a non-lawyer member of the firm’s Labor and Employment group. She is pursuing an MBA with a concentration in Human Resources Management at the University of Connecticut and preparing for the SHRM-CP exam. Romania is also a member of the…

Romania Jawahir is a non-lawyer member of the firm’s Labor and Employment group. She is pursuing an MBA with a concentration in Human Resources Management at the University of Connecticut and preparing for the SHRM-CP exam. Romania is also a member of the firm’s Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Team.

Read more about Romania MorleyEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    Carmody @ Work
  • Organization:
    Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo