Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupportContact
Search
Close

President Biden’s Executive Order Mandates Project Labor Agreements for All “Large-Scale” Federal Construction Projects

By Peter J. Eyre, Thomas P. Gies, Kris D. Meade, Nicole Owren-Wiest & Jessica Nam on February 8, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

On February 4, 2022, President Biden signed an Executive Order on Use of Project Labor Agreements for Federal Construction Projects (the “Order”) for federal construction projects valued at $35 million or more. The Order instructs federal agencies to require “every contractor or subcontractor engaged in construction” on projects valued at $35 million or more to “agree, for that project, to negotiate or become a party to” a Project Labor Agreement (“PLA”) with “one or more appropriate labor organizations.”

Federal agencies are authorized to grant exceptions to this PLA requirement under certain defined circumstances. The Order supersedes an executive order issued by then-President Obama in 2009, which had encouraged, but not mandated, the use of PLAs on construction projects valued at more than $25 million. The Order is characterized as a measure that will “promote economy and efficiency in Federal procurement” and advance “small business interests” and represents a noteworthy shift in United States federal labor policy, underscoring President Biden’s commitment to fulfilling his campaign promise to be the most labor-friendly President in history.

The Order applies to all “large-scale construction projects,” defined as a “Federal construction project within the United States for which the total estimated cost of the construction contract to the federal government is $35 million or more.” The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council (“FAR Council”), in consultation with the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, may adjust this threshold based on inflation. “Construction” is defined to mean “construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, modernization, alteration, conversion, extension, repair, or improvement of buildings, structures, highways, or other real property.” It appears that the Order does not apply to federally funded projects under the control of state and/or local governments.

The Order enumerates various procedural and substantive requirements for PLAs. Agencies awarding a contract with a “large-scale construction project, or obligating funds pursuant to such a contract,” must require every participating contractor or subcontractor “to negotiate or become a party to a [PLA] with one or more appropriate labor organizations.” Upon reaching an agreement, PLAs must bind all contractors and subcontractors in all relevant solicitation provisions and contract documents. Contractors and subcontractors must be allowed to “compete for contracts and subcontracts without regard to whether they are otherwise parties to collective bargaining agreements.” The PLA must also, among other things, “contain guarantees against strikes, lockouts, and similar job disruptions,” and establish “effective, prompt, and mutually binding procedures for resolving labor disputes arising during” the term of the PLA.

The Order authorizes senior officials within an agency to grant an exception to the use of a PLA for a federal construction project. In order for an exception to be granted, the agency must, no later than the date of the solicitation, submit a specific written explanation of why at least one of the following circumstances exists with respect to that contract:

  • Requiring a PLA on the construction project would not advance the federal government’s “interests in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement,” based on the following factors: (1) the project is short and “lacks operational complexity”; (2) the project will involve “only one craft or trade”; (3) the project will involve “specialized construction work that is available from only a limited number of contractors or subcontractors”; (4) the “agency’s need for the project is of such an unusual and compelling urgency that a [PLA] would be impracticable”; or (5) the project implicates other similar factors deemed appropriate in regulations or guidance issued by the FAR Council or the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”);
  • “Based on an inclusive market analysis, requiring a [PLA] on the project would substantially reduce the number of potential bidders so as to frustrate full and open competition”; or
  • “Requiring a [PLA] on the project would otherwise be inconsistent with statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, or Presidential Memoranda.”

The Order directs the FAR Council to publish proposed implementing regulations by June 6, 2022. The Departments of Defense and Labor and the OMB must coordinate in designing a training strategy to ensure federal contracting officials across all agencies are aligned regarding PLAs by May 5, 2022. The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Labor, and the Director of the OMB have until 180 days of the publication of the proposed regulations to provide a report to the Assistant to the President for Economic Policy and Director of the National Economic Council on the contents of the training strategy.

The Order will apply to all solicitations for contracts issued on or after the effective date of the final regulations to be issued by the FAR Council. Federal agencies are “strongly encouraged” to comply with the Order, “to the extent permitted by law,” for solicitations issued between February 4, 2022 and the effective date of the final regulations issued by the FAR Council, or solicitations that have already been issued and are outstanding as of February 4, 2022.

The FAR Council will be required to resolve, through rule-making, certain ambiguities in the Order. For instance, the Order is unclear as to whether companies that supply only materials to be used at the construction site, but do not engage in “construction” activity, will be required to enter into a PLA.

Crowell & Moring will continue to monitor developments relating to the Order, the FAR Council’s upcoming regulations and any litigation challenging this Order.

Photo of Peter J. Eyre Peter J. Eyre

Peter J. Eyre is a partner and co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board. Peter was named to BTI Consulting Group’s list of “Client Service All-Stars” in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and…

Peter J. Eyre is a partner and co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board. Peter was named to BTI Consulting Group’s list of “Client Service All-Stars” in 2016, 2017, and 2019 and has been named an Acritas Star, Acritas Stars Independently Rated Lawyers (2016, 2017, 2019). He is nationally ranked by Chambers USA in Government Contracts since 2014, and by Super Lawyers since 2017.

Read more about Peter J. EyreEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Thomas P. Gies Thomas P. Gies

Thomas P. Gies is a founding member of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. Tom has more than 35 years of experience in litigating employment disputes. Tom’s litigation experience includes five jury trials, two U.S. Supreme Court arguments, 18 federal appellate court…

Thomas P. Gies is a founding member of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. Tom has more than 35 years of experience in litigating employment disputes. Tom’s litigation experience includes five jury trials, two U.S. Supreme Court arguments, 18 federal appellate court arguments, and more than a hundred trial court and arbitration matters involving a wide range of labor and employment law issues, including traditional labor law, whistleblower retaliation, EEO claims and wage & hour class and collective actions. Tom also maintains an active compliance counseling practice, involving the full range of employment law issues facing U.S. employers. Tom’s traditional labor counseling practice has focused on helping companies develop and implement strategies in situations involving operational restructurings, facility closures, subcontracting of bargaining unit work, and work stoppages.

Read more about Thomas P. GiesEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Kris D. Meade Kris D. Meade

Kris D. Meade is co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board and Executive Committee. He counsels and represents employers in the full range of employment and traditional labor law matters, including…

Kris D. Meade is co-chair of Crowell & Moring’s Labor & Employment Group. He is also a member of the firm’s Management Board and Executive Committee. He counsels and represents employers in the full range of employment and traditional labor law matters, including individual and class action lawsuits filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, ERISA, and companion state statutes. Kris represents employers in connection with union organizing campaigns, collective bargaining, labor arbitrations, and unfair labor practice litigation. In 2020, Chambers USA recognized Kris as a leading labor and employment lawyer.

Read more about Kris D. MeadeEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Nicole Owren-Wiest Nicole Owren-Wiest

Nicole Owren-Wiest is a partner and member of the Steering Committee of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. Nicole is nationally ranked by Chambers USA in Government Contracts and a recognized leader in two of the most…

Nicole Owren-Wiest is a partner and member of the Steering Committee of Crowell & Moring’s Government Contracts Group in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. Nicole is nationally ranked by Chambers USA in Government Contracts and a recognized leader in two of the most complex areas in government contracting: accounting, cost, and pricing, and intellectual property/data rights. With over 20 years’ experience, Nicole has a broad counseling and dispute-resolution practice and leads the Group’s cost accounting practice, which focuses on helping clients navigate the government’s complex cost and pricing rules, including the FAR Part 31 cost principles, the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), and Truth in Negotiations Act/Truthful Cost or Pricing Data (defective pricing).

Read more about Nicole Owren-WiestEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Jessica Nam Jessica Nam

Jessica S. Nam is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the Labor & Employment Group. Jessica represents employers in both litigation and counseling matters.

Prior to joining the firm, Jessica was an attorney-advisor with the Department of…

Jessica S. Nam is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and a member of the Labor & Employment Group. Jessica represents employers in both litigation and counseling matters.

Prior to joining the firm, Jessica was an attorney-advisor with the Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges and served as law clerk for the Honorable Karen T. Nakasone in the First Circuit Court, Hawaii State Judiciary. As an attorney-advisor, Jessica was responsible for managing Office of Contractor Compliance Programs cases arising under Executive Order 11246, as well as matters involving whistleblower retaliation, minimum wage compliance disputes, and contract disputes.

Read more about Jessica NamEmail
Show more Show less
  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor, Government and Public Policy
  • Blog:
    Government Contracts Legal Forum
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
The Library at LexBlog
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Library at LexBlog
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo