Skip to content

Menu

LexBlog, Inc. logo
NetworkSub-MenuBrowse by SubjectBrowse by PublisherJoin the NetworkGet StartedSubscribeSupport
Contact Us
Search
Close

2022 MHPAEA Annual Report Illuminates Tri-agency Review and Enforcement Priorities in a Post-Consolidated Appropriations Act World

By William Tucker & Crowell & Moring on February 11, 2022
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (“HHS”), and the Treasury (the “Tri-agencies”) released their 2022 annual report to Congress on the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (“MHPAEA”) on Tuesday, January 25. The Employee Benefits Security Administration (“EBSA”) released an FY 2021 MHPAEA Enforcement Fact Sheet alongside the annual report. Together, the Tri-agencies’ report and EBSA fact sheet provide additional, important information for group health plans and health insurance issuers looking to comply with the 2021 Consolidated Appropriations Act’s (“CAA”) non-quantitative treatment limitation (“NQTL”) comparative analysis requirements. But plans and issuers need additional agency guidance.

Much of the report is dedicated to breaking down EBSA and HHS enforcement under the CAA during 2021, detailing the number of comparative analysis requests issued, “insufficiency” letters issued in response to the comparative analyses received, and initial determinations of non-compliant NQTLs. The Tri-agencies were critical of overall compliance—indeed, they found no comparative analyses to be initially compliant—but have not yet issued any final determinations of non-compliance, although some inquiries are ongoing.

The Tri-agencies’ report also confirms the enforcement priorities laid out in EBSA’s FAQs Part 45, providing additional data on the NQTLs for which the Tri-agencies most frequently requested comparative analyses and identifying representative themes and examples of the ways in which the submitted comparative analyses fell short. Building on those themes, the report provides some commentary on what constitutes a compliant comparative analysis. Notably, this includes demonstration of parity compliance for NQTLs as applied, which may be difficult to measure. Prior Tri-agency guidance, including EBSA’s Self-Compliance Tool, has emphasized that outcomes are not determinative of compliance, but that outcomes analyses may be used to identify “red flags” or areas for compliance review.

The 2022 annual report is only the beginning of the post-2021 CAA era.  The report indicates that the Tri-agencies intend to promulgate additional regulatory amendments in 2022 via notice and comment rulemaking. In addition, the Tri-agencies seek enhanced enforcement tools—namely the authority to assess civil monetary penalties for parity violations, expanded scope of enforcement authority, the possibility of participant and beneficiary recovery for parity violations, among other changes—via Congressional action.

For a more detailed breakdown of the Tri-agencies’ report findings, read Crowell’s 2022 MHPAEA Annual Report Client Alert.  And for more information, contact the blog authors or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.

Photo of William Tucker William Tucker

Will Tucker is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he practices in the Health Care and Government Contracts groups. Will represents clients in a range of complex litigation and counseling engagements. He helps clients navigate relationships with federal and state…

Will Tucker is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office, where he practices in the Health Care and Government Contracts groups. Will represents clients in a range of complex litigation and counseling engagements. He helps clients navigate relationships with federal and state regulators, often regarding the use of emerging technologies and implementation of new business models. His counseling practice covers fraud and abuse compliance, state licensure guidance, responding to federal audits, and state procurement procedures, among other issues. His litigation practice spans both plaintiff-side and defense work, including fraud, data rights, and insurance disputes in federal court, as well as bid protests before the Government Accountability Office.

Read more about William TuckerEmail
Show more Show less
Photo of Crowell & Moring Crowell & Moring
Read more about Crowell & MoringEmail
  • Posted in:
    Health Care and Life Sciences
  • Blog:
    Health Law
  • Organization:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Call us at 1-800-913-0988 or email sales@lexblog.com.

Facebook LinkedIn Twitter RSS
  • About LexBlog
  • The Field We Built
  • Our Beliefs
  • Our Team
  • Contact LexBlog
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Get Started
  • Publishing Solutions
  • Compass
  • Submit a Request
  • Support Center
  • System Status
Copyright © 2026, LexBlog, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo